Headline
The Supreme Court of India criticized the strike of Lawyers’ and directed the Bar Association to File undertaking.
Summary
The Supreme Court of India condemned the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association for strikes done by lawyers’, stating the unjust harm caused to the litigants. The Supreme Court ordered an undertaking from the Bar Association to end strikes,quoting the illegal nature of such actions under Captain Harish Uppal v. Union of India.The matter arose from the Association’s July 2024 strike, which ruined the proceedings of court, influencing thousands of litigants.
Key Facts
- Case Name: M/S M3M India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Judges Name: Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih
- Bar Association members shunned from court work in July 2024, hampering judicial processes.
- The Supreme Court reprimanded the Association for its unwillingness to give an undertaking to avoid future strikes.
- The Supreme Court granted time until 8th December ,2024 for the Bar Association to submit an unconditional undertaking.
Legal Insights
The decision of the Supreme Court restates the illegality of lawyers’ strikes, aligning with the ruling of Captain Harish Uppal, which bans such actions as they hamper the judiciary and harm litigants. The Bar Association was notified of contempt action and disciplinary measures.
Impact
This decision focuses on judicial discipline and showcases the significance of maintaining undisturbed legal processes for the access to justice by the public.
Why it Matters
This case highlights the requirement for lawyers to protest through lawful channels, making sure that litigants are not held hostage by strikes. It also shows the continued efforts of the court to safeguard judicial independence and uphold the rule of law.
Source
