CONTEMPT FOR NOT VACATING PREMISES THE TENANT WAS HELD GUILTY

by | Sep 16, 2024

Headline

The Supreme Court of India for failing to vacate property convicts the tenant for contempt of court.

Summary

The Supreme Court of India convicted a tenant  as he violated the order of the court to vacate a premise and did contempt of court. Despite several chances, the tenant continued to delay compliance, which ultimately led to his conviction.

Key Facts

  • Case Name: M/s Sitaram Enterprises vs. Prithviraj Vardichand Jain
  • Name of Judges: Justice JK Maheshwari and Justice Rajesh Bindal  
  • Eviction order was made to the tenant Initially in 2015, and later affirmed by the Bombay High Court in 2022 .
  • Tenant avoided a 9 month vacate order and failed to comply with a bailable warrant.

Legal Insights

The Supreme Court of India stresses that contempt power as provided under Article 129 of Indian Constitution is important to uphold the rule of law, strengthening the authority of judicial orders.

Impact

The tenant was given imprisonment of 1 day and the Court ordered forcible eviction of the tenant from the premises if he fails to vacate within a week.

Why it Matters

This case showcases the firm stand of the judiciary in upholding its orders, preserving the rule of law, and ensuring compliance to maintain public confidence.

 

Source:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Written By Archana Singh

I am Archana Singh, a recent law master's graduate with a strong aspiration for the judicial service. My passion lies in elucidating complex legal concepts, disseminating legal news, and enhancing legal awareness. I take immense pride in introducing my new legal website - The LawGist. Through my meticulously crafted blogs and articles, I aim to empower individuals with comprehensive legal insights. My unwavering dedication is to facilitate a profound comprehension of the law, enabling people to execute judicious and well-informed choices.

Related Posts