SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES TRAI'S REGULATORY POWERS VIS-À-VIS TDSAT JURISDICTION CASE SUMMARY - The Supreme Court in Telecom Regulatory Authority of India vs. M/s Polimer Cable Network & Others (2026) clarified the distinction between TRAI's regulatory functions and...
Nancy Sharma
SUPREME COURT ON ARTICLE 32 MULTIPLE FIRS & CYBER FRAUD INVESTIGATIONS
SUPREME COURT ON ARTICLE 32 MULTIPLE FIRS & CYBER FRAUD INVESTIGATIONS CASE SUMMARY - The Supreme Court in Rutvij Bhagat Singh Wakhare vs. State of Maharashtra & Others (2026) dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing or consolidation of four cyber...
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES MACPS FOR RAILWAY GUARDS- SAME GRADE PAY PROMOTIONS COUNT UNDER PARAGRAPH 8
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES MACPS FOR RAILWAY GUARDS- SAME GRADE PAY PROMOTIONS COUNT UNDER PARAGRAPH 8 CASE SUMMARY - The Supreme Court clarified in Union of India & Ors. vs. Railway Guard (MACPS Case) the interpretation of the Modified Assured Career Progression...
SUPREME COURT ON TERRORIST CONSPIRACY, CO-ACCUSED CONFESSION, CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE & DEATH PENALTY
SUPREME COURT ON TERRORIST CONSPIRACY, CO-ACCUSED CONFESSION, CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE & DEATH PENALTY CASE SUMMARY - The Supreme Court in Dr. Abdul Hameed vs. State of Rajasthan & Connected Appeals examined appeals arising from the 1996 Samleti Bus Bomb...
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES SALE VS AGENCY IN CNG DISTRIBUTION UNDER THE FINANCE ACT, 1994
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES SALE VS AGENCY IN CNG DISTRIBUTION UNDER THE FINANCE ACT, 1994 CASE SUMMARY - The Supreme Court in Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. examined whether BPCL and...
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN OBSCENE AND ABUSIVE WORDS UNDER SECTION 294 IPC
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN OBSCENE AND ABUSIVE WORDS UNDER SECTION 294 IPC CASE SUMMARY - The Supreme Court in Mani @ Subramaniyam vs. State represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police (2026 INSC 719) held that abusive or vulgar...




