Headline
The Supreme Court of India condemns bureaucratic harassment of Women Sarpanches and grants Relief to women of Chattisgarh.
Summary
The Supreme Court of India condemned bureaucratic partiality against female elected representatives while granting relief to a woman Sarpanch removed on grounds of arbitrary. It stresses on the requirement for administrative reform to empower women in governance.
Key Facts
- Case Name: Sonam Lakra vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.
- Judges Name: Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan.
- In 2020,Sonam Lakra, a 27-year-old Sarpanch elected who was removed in 2023 for alleged delays in construction projects.
- The Supreme Court observed the delays were not connected to her and criticised the arbitrary removal.
Legal Insights
- The Supreme Court showcased the systemic discrimination against female representatives requesting reform to safeguard democratic values.
- Condemned the High Court for refusing relief, focusing on the requirement for judicial interference in executive misuse of power.
Impact
The judgment shows rights of women in governance and highlights the accountability of bureaucrats for harassment.
Why It Matters
It calls for dismantling orthodox attitudes in administration and encouraging a supportive environment for women leaders, vital for inclusive democracy.
Source
