Current Affairs

DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (16 APRIL 2026)

by | Apr 16, 2026

Supreme Court debates on Sabarimala, judicial independence, and constitutional morality.

Supreme Court debates constitutional morality in religion, questions judicial independence narratives, and examines faith-based practices in Sabarimala case.

DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (16 APRIL 2026)

CONSTITUTIONAL MORALITY DEBATE IN SABARIMALA HEARING

Case Name: Sabarimala Reference (9-Judge Bench)

During the Sabarimala reference, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi argued before the Supreme Court of India that applying “constitutional morality” to religious practices can be disruptive and misplaced. He cautioned against courts overriding deeply rooted beliefs, highlighting the tension between constitutional values and faith-based traditions. 

Legal Provisions:

  • Article 25 – Freedom of Religion
  • Article 26 – Religious Autonomy
  • Constitutional Morality Doctrine
  • Essential Religious Practices Test
  • Judicial Review Limits

Source: Supreme Court of India

JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE JUDGED BY OUTCOMES: JUSTICE BINDAL

Overview : Observations by Justice Rajesh Bindal

Justice Rajesh Bindal observed that judges decide cases strictly based on law, yet are often labelled “independent” or otherwise depending on outcomes in high-stakes matters. The remark reflects concerns over public perception of the judiciary, stressing that judicial independence must be assessed institutionally, not through selective reactions to verdicts.

Legal Provisions:

  • Judicial Independence Doctrine
  • Rule of Law Principle
  • Article 50 – Separation of Judiciary
  • Public Confidence in Judiciary
  • Constitutional Governance

Source: Supreme Court of India

SABARIMALA: ENTRY OF FERTILE WOMEN LINKED TO DEITY’S IDENTITY

Case Name: KANTARU RAJEEVARU Versus INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION THR.ITS GENERAL SECRETARY MS. BHAKTI PASRIJA AND ORS., R.P.(C) No. 3358/2018 in W.P.(C) No. 373/2006

The Travancore Devaswom Board told the Supreme Court of India that restricting entry of women of reproductive age is tied to the deity’s identity as a celibate. It argued such women can visit other Ayyappa temples, asserting that the practice has a rational nexus with preserving the temple’s unique religious character. 

Legal Provisions:

  • Article 25 – Right to Practice Religion
  • Article 26 – Denominational Rights
  • Essential Religious Practices Doctrine
  • Reasonable Classification Test
  • Religious Autonomy vs Equality

Source: Supreme Court of India

Also Read: DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (14 APRIL 2026)

 

 

 

Written By Vishakha Khatri

My name is Vishakha Khatri. I am an engineering graduate and a civil service aspirant with a passion for spreading knowledge about Indian polity. I believe that understanding our political system is crucial for every citizen, and I am committed to making this information accessible to everyone in my own easy way. Through my experiences in civil service preparation and my unique perspective as an engineering graduate, I hope to inspire and educate others on the importance of Indian polity.

Related Posts