Courtroom Chronicles

Courtrooms Chronicle provides comprehensive coverage of judgments, case updates, court orders, and public interest litigations (PIL). Stay informed on the latest legal developments, landmark decisions, and significant rulings across various jurisdictions. Whether you’re a legal professional, researcher, or interested citizen, Courtrooms Chronicle delivers timely and insightful content to keep you abreast of the dynamic landscape of the judiciary system.

Recent Posts

SUPREME COURT ON MINOR’S PROPERTY, GUARDIANSHIP AND SECTION 8 HMGA

SUPREME COURT ON MINOR’S PROPERTY, GUARDIANSHIP AND SECTION 8 HMGA

The Supreme Court held that courts must evaluate whether a proposed transaction involving a minor’s immovable property provides an evident advantage to the minor. Granting permission for a development agreement, the Court emphasized welfare, practical benefit, and judicial oversight under Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.

SC ON MENTAL CRUELTY, PROLONGED SEPARATION AND IRRETRIEVABLE BREAKDOWN OF MARRIAGE

SC ON MENTAL CRUELTY, PROLONGED SEPARATION AND IRRETRIEVABLE BREAKDOWN OF MARRIAGE

The Supreme Court upheld divorce between two doctors who had lived separately for over fifteen years, holding that denial of conjugal relations, failure to perform matrimonial obligations, and prolonged separation amounted to mental cruelty. The Court further exercised Article 142 powers to dissolve the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown.

SC CLARIFIES TENANTS-IN-COMMON STATUS UNDER SECTION 8 OF THE HINDU SUCCESSION ACT

SC CLARIFIES TENANTS-IN-COMMON STATUS UNDER SECTION 8 OF THE HINDU SUCCESSION ACT

The Supreme Court in Darubai v. Kamalabai (2026) reaffirmed that property devolving under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act is inherited in an individual capacity. Legal heirs become tenants-in-common with defined shares, and one heir cannot act as karta to alienate the entire property on grounds of legal necessity.

SC ON NATURAL JUSTICE, REMOVAL OF MATHADHIPATI AND ARTICLE 142 POWERS 

SC ON NATURAL JUSTICE, REMOVAL OF MATHADHIPATI AND ARTICLE 142 POWERS 

The Supreme Court held that the removal of the Mathadhipati of Sri Swamy Hathiramji Mutt was illegal due to denial of natural justice, non-supply of relied-upon documents, procedural bias, and defective inquiry proceedings. Exercising powers under Article 142, the Court constituted an independent one-man inquiry committee.