
Courts examine Telegram regulation, action against NEET paper leak channels, and a challenge to recognition of West Bengal’s Opposition Leader.
DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (17 JUNE 2026)
DELHI HC HEARS CHALLENGE TO TELEGRAM BLOCKING DEMANDS
Case Name: Telegram FZ-LLC v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court heard Telegram’s challenge against directions seeking restrictions on the platform. During the proceedings, the Court questioned the basis and scope of blocking measures, while emphasizing the need to balance national interests, cyber security concerns, and users’ rights to access digital communication platforms. The matter remains under consideration.
LEGAL PROVISIONS & FRAMEWORK
- Information Technology Act, 2000
- Section 69A – Blocking powers of the Government
- Information Technology (Blocking Rules), 2009
- Article 19(1)(a) – Freedom of speech and expression
- Article 19(1)(g) – Right to trade and business
- Principles of proportionality and digital rights
Source: Delhi High Court
TELEGRAM TELLS DELHI HC IT BLOCKED CHANNELS LINKED TO NEET PAPER LEAK
Case Name: Telegram FZ-LLC v. Union of India & Ors.
Telegram informed the Delhi High Court that it had taken action against channels allegedly connected with the NEET examination paper leak controversy. The platform stated that identified channels had been blocked in compliance with legal requirements, while stressing its commitment to cooperating with lawful investigations and preserving platform integrity.
LEGAL PROVISIONS & FRAMEWORK
- Information Technology Act, 2000
- Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024
- Cybercrime and digital evidence principles
- Intermediary liability framework
- Data protection and investigation cooperation norms
- Examination integrity regulations
Source: Delhi High Court
CALCUTTA HC RESERVES ORDER IN TMC’S CHALLENGE TO RECOGNITION OF OPPOSITION LEADER
Case Name: All India Trinamool Congress v. Speaker, West Bengal Legislative Assembly & Ors.
The Calcutta High Court reserved its judgment on the Trinamool Congress challenge to the Speaker’s decision recognising rebel MLA Ritabrata Banerjee as the Leader of Opposition. The dispute raises significant questions regarding legislative procedure, recognition of opposition leadership, and the scope of the Speaker’s constitutional authority.
LEGAL PROVISIONS & FRAMEWORK
- Constitution of India
- Tenth Schedule (Anti-Defection Law)
- Legislative Assembly Rules of Procedure
- Speaker’s constitutional powers
- Judicial review of legislative decisions
- Democratic representation principles
Source: Calcutta High Court
ALSO READ – DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (15 JUNE 2026)





