Headline
The Allahabad High Court in Dowry Death Case Upholds Charges Against Adarsh Yadav.
Summary
The Allahabad High Court has rejected to quash charges under Sections 498A and 304B of the Indian Penal Code( IPC) against Adarsh Yadav, who was a live-in partner of a woman who died by suicide. The Court found adequate evidence showing they lived together “as husband and wife.”
Key Facts
- Case Name: Adarsh Yadav vs. State of UP and Another
- Judge Name: Justice Raj Beer Singh
- The trial court had earlier rejected the application of Adarsh Yadav for discharge.
- The Allahabad High Court stressed that living together as husband and wife is sufficient for charges under Sections 498A and 304B of the Indian Penal Code, regardless of formal marriage.
- The State presented evidence of dowry harassment leading to the woman’s suicide.
Legal Insights
The Allahabad High Court cited the ruling of the Supreme Court in ‘Reema Aggarwal vs. Anupam (2004),’ affirming that the lack of a legal marriage does not spare a partner from liability under the relevant IPC sections.
Impact
This decision highlights the stand of the judiciary on safeguarding women’s rights and holding accountable those responsible for dowry-related offenses.
Why it Matters
It strengthens legal protections against domestic violence and dowry death, showcasing that informal relationships can still lead to serious legal consequences.
Source:
