Supreme Court delivers landmark ruling on gender equality in inheritance for Scheduled Tribes.
SC GRANTS EQUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS TO TRIBAL WOMAN’S HEIRS
CASE SUMMARY – In Ram Charan & Ors. vs. Sukhram & Ors., the Supreme Court addressed the question of whether tribal women or their heirs are entitled to ancestral property. Lower courts denied this right due to lack of proven custom and the exclusionary clause under the Hindu Succession Act for Scheduled Tribes. The Supreme Court overturned these decisions, emphasizing that in absence of codified law or proven custom, principles of justice, equity, and good conscience must prevail. The Court recognized gender equality under Article 14 and granted equal inheritance rights to the legal heirs of a tribal woman, setting a landmark precedent.
| ASPECTS | DETAILS |
| Case Title | Ram Charan & Ors. vs. Sukhram & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 9537 of 2025 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 5559 of 2023) |
| Introduction | Appeal against the Chhattisgarh High Court’s affirmation denying tribal women’s rights to ancestral property based on lack of proven custom. |
| Factual Background | The appellants are heirs of Dhaiya, a tribal woman seeking partition in her father’s property. Lower courts denied rights citing lack of proof of custom and exclusion by Hindu Succession Act. |
| Legal Issues | Whether a tribal woman (or her heirs) is entitled to an equal share in ancestral property in absence of proven custom. |
| Applicable Law |
|
| Analysis | Courts below erred by presuming exclusion of women. Justice, equity, and good conscience must guide decisions in absence of codified law/custom. |
| Conclusion | Supreme Court granted equal inheritance rights to the legal heirs of Dhaiya, overturning the decisions of lower courts. |
| Current Scenario | The judgment is now precedent-setting in ensuring gender equality for Scheduled Tribes where codified succession law is absent. |
“Customs too, like law, cannot remain stuck in time.”
SOURCE – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
READ ALSO – ARTICLE 14
