SUPREME COURT ON RESERVATION FOR WOMEN UNDER SC SPORTS

by | Apr 10, 2025

 Supreme Court of India judgment on Punjab DSP reservation.

Supreme Court judgment reinforces women’s reservation in Punjab Civil Services.


SUPREME COURT ON RESERVATION FOR WOMEN UNDER SC SPORTS


ASPECTS DETAILS
Case Title Prabhjot Kaur vs. State of Punjab and Others
Introduction The case revolves around horizontal reservation for women in the Punjab Civil Services, challenging the alteration of reservation categories mid-recruitment.
Factual Background The Punjab government issued recruitment advertisements (No.08 and No.14) for various civil services posts, including DSP. A horizontal 33% women reservation under 2020 Rules led to the reservation of a DSP post for “SC Sports (Women)”.
Legal Issues
  1. Whether the DSP post could be reserved for “SC Sports (Women)” under the 2020 Rules,
  2. Whether a roster introduced after the application deadline can retrospectively alter recruitment terms.
Applicable Law
  1. Punjab Civil Services (Reservation of Posts for Women) Rules, 2020;
  2. Article 14 of the Constitution;
  3.  SC rulings in K. Manjusree and Tej Prakash Pathak.
Analysis The Supreme Court noted that eligibility criteria, once declared through an advertisement, cannot be altered retrospectively. It held that the 2020 Rules were validly implemented, and the reservation for “SC Sports (Women)” was lawful and binding.
Conclusion The appeal was allowed; the Division Bench order was set aside. The Single Judge’s ruling, upholding the original advertisement and the appellant’s appointment, was restored.
Current Scenario The appellant is confirmed for appointment as DSP under “SC Sports (Women)” category. The state must comply with the ruling within three weeks.

CASE SUMMARY  – In this case, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the appellant, Prabhjot Kaur, confirming her appointment under the “SC Sports (Women)” category for DSP post in Punjab Civil Services. The court held that the applicable advertisement and 2020 Rules, which mandated 33% horizontal reservation for women, were valid and unchallenged. It concluded that post-process changes such as introducing new rosters cannot invalidate earlier selections. Citing precedents like K. Manjusree, it ruled that the state cannot modify eligibility criteria after recruitment begins. The appeal against the High Court’s Division Bench order was allowed, and the learned Single Judge’s judgment was reinstated.

“Rules of the game cannot be changed once the recruitment process has commenced.”

 

SOURCE –

 

Written By Nancy Sharma

I am Nancy Mahavir Sharma, a passionate legal writer and a judicial service aspirant who is interested in legal researching and writing. I have completed Latin Legum Magister degree. I have been writing from past few years and I am excited to share my legal thoughts and opinions here. I believe that everyone has the potential to make a difference.

Related Posts