Headline
The Supreme Court of India to dicide the case of transfer of Gyanvapi Dispute to the High Court of Allahabad.
Summary
The Supreme Court of India is considering a plea to transfer 15 cases regarding Kashi Vishwanath Temple-Gyanvapi Mosque dispute to the High Court of Allahabad. The issue has contradictory claims over the religious character of the Gyanvapi compound and implications under the Places of Worship Act, 1991.
Key Facts
- Case Name: Muslim Parties vs. Varanasi Court Orders
- Judges Name: Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
- The court of Varanasi permitted Hindu priests to pray in the mosque’s southern cellar; On 31st January,2023 the Allahabad HC upheld this..
- The Supreme Court ordered status quo, allowing separate worship zones for Hindus and Muslims.
- Senior Advocate Shyam Divan supports transfer to make sure of uniformity, while Senior Advocate Huzefa Ahmadi opposes it, quoting potential High Court burden.
Legal Insights
The controversy challenges the Places of Worship Act, 1991, which conserves the status of religious sites as of August 15, 1947. Claims of prior Hindu worship and the role of ASI surveys makes the matter difficult.
Impact
A unified decision of the High Court could settle conflicting orders but may strain judicial resources. It also tests the scope of the Places of Worship Act,1991.
Why It Matters
The case showcases delicate matters of religious identity, historical claims, and the balance between judicial processes and legislative safeguards .
Source
