Headline
The Supreme Court of India permits plea against UP Demolition and orders an approach to the High Court.
Summary
The Supreme Court of India disposed of a petition of contempt in Mohammed Ghayoor v. Rajender Pensiya & Ors., providing liberty to the petitioner to approach the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner alleged that the authorities of Uttar Pradesh demolished his property without prior notice, violating demolition directions of 2024 of the Supreme Court .
Key Facts
- Case Name: Mohammed Ghayoor vs. Rajender Pensiya & Ors.
- Judge Name: Justice BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran
- Issue: Alleged violation of the order of the SC’s of 13 ,November , 2024 restraining demolitions without due process.
- Petitioner’s Claim: His factory in Sambhal was demolished without prior notice, threatening his livelihood.
- The Supreme Court of India ordered the petitioner to approach the Allahabad High Court, dismissing to stay 3rd party rights.
Legal Insights
The 2024 guidelines of the Supreme Court of India mandate a show-cause notice, personal hearing, and time for appeal before any demolition. Authorities violating these guidelines will contempt the proceedings and personal liability for restitution and damages.
Impact
This case shows the requirement of due process in demolition actions and holds officials responsible for illegal bulldozer actions. It also shed light on the petitioner’s right to seek redressal from the High Court.
Why It Matters
The ruling of the Supreme Court upholds legal protection against arbitrary demolitions, making sure of the protection of property rights and livelihoods while maintaining judicial oversight over executive actions.
Source:
