In penal law, not all injurious acts are considered offenses. There exist multiple situations wherein an individual may be released from criminal culpability as a result of the circumstances surrounding the commission of the conduct. The legal concept of “General Exceptions” encompass these, taking into consideration deeds committed in good faith, by accident, or under certain circumstances without the intent to commit a crime. It is easier to understand how the legal system acknowledges human fallibility and provides justification for certain actions when we are aware of these exceptions. Earlier the general exceptions were covered between Sections 76 to 95 of Indian Penal Code.
Mistake of Fact (Section 14)
Mistakes occur, but the law makes a distinction between factual and legal mistakes. Someone is not legally responsible if they act out of a sincere misunderstanding of fact and think they are required to by law. This shields those who, despite their mistakes, are not malicious. For example, a soldier on a mission who follows a wrong order because he honestly thinks he must obey orders is pardoned.
Judicial Acts and Court Orders (Sections 15 & 16)
These sections protect judges and those who are carrying out court directions. A judge or an officer is not breaking the law if they render a decision or carry out an order in good faith, even if it is later determined to be unlawful. This guarantees that people in positions of authority can carry out their responsibilities without worrying about facing criminal charges as long as they behave within the parameters of their knowledge.
Acts Justified by Law or Mistaken Belief (Section 17)
People are protected even if they are incorrect in their belief that the law justifies them. For instance, even if it turns out that the person trying to capture the suspect is innocent, they might not be held liable if they truly think they are apprehending a criminal.
Accidents and Misfortunes (Section 18)
Not every accident results in a crime. When someone does a lawful act with due care and it unintentionally causes injury, they are not at fault. For instance, it is not a crime but rather an unfortunate accident if a carpenter uses a flying tool to harm a witness while using appropriate caution.
Preventing Greater Harm (Section 19)
This section recognizes that harm may occasionally be required in order to avert more serious harm. A ship captain’s decision to alter course in order to prevent hitting with another vessel while endangering life is justified if they do so.
Children, Mental Incapacity, and Intoxication (Sections 20–24)
Children under the age of seven and, depending on their maturity, those between the ages of seven and twelve are exempt from criminal responsibility. In a similar vein, those who are mentally incapacitated or involuntarily drunk are exempt from criminal liability because they are incapable of understanding their actions at the time.
Acts Done with Consent (Sections 25–27)
Provided that the act was not intended to inflict substantial injury, the law may absolve the person who caused the harm if the victim gives their agreement. In a friendly boxing bout, for example, both players agree to the risk of injury, which is not illegal. In a similar vein, even risky medical operations carried out with the agreement of the patient are covered by these sections.
Invalid Consent and Independent Offenses (Sections 28–29)
When someone gives their consent out of fear, coercion, or ignorance—such as children or mentally ill people—it is not considered valid. Furthermore, some crimes, such as causing a miscarriage, continue to be crimes even when the victim gives their consent.
Emergency Acts Without Consent (Section 30)
When consent is not able to be gained in an emergency, people working in good faith to save the lives of others, like surgeons, performing life-saving procedures, are protected from criminal charges.
Good Faith Communication (Section 31)
This clause safeguards those who injure others by truthful statements intended to benefit another. For instance, a doctor is not guilty of a felony if they tell a patient in good faith that they have a terminal illness and the patient is harmed by the shock.
Compulsion and Immediate Threats (Section 32)
Except in situations involving murder or other serious crimes, a person may be exempt from culpability if they are coerced into committing a crime under the threat of immediate death. This safeguards people who are subjected to severe coercion.
Trivial Harm (Section 33)
As a last resort least, inconsequential acts that result in little to no harm—like a tiny hit in a busy place—are not considered crimes. The law acknowledges that certain injuries are so slight as not to require filing a lawsuit.
| Section | Provision | Explanation | Example |
| Section 14 | Mistake of Fact (EARLIER U/S- 76) | Genuine belief due to a mistake of fact, not law, is not an offense. | A soldier fires at a mob under orders, believing it is lawful. |
| Section 15 | Judges Acting Judicially (EARLIER U/S- 77) | Judges acting in good faith with lawful power aren’t liable. | A judge issues an order based on a lawful interpretation of the case. |
| Section 16 | Acts Done Under Court Orders (EARLIER U/S- 78) | Following a court order in good faith, even if the court had no authority, is not an offense. | A police officer arrests someone under a mistaken but lawful order. |
| Section 17 | Mistaken Belief of Justification (EARLIER U/S- 79) | Acts done in good faith under mistaken legal justification are excusable. | Arresting someone believed to be a criminal, but they acted in self-defense. |
| Section 18 | Accidental Acts During Lawful Activities (EARLIER U/S- 80) | Accidents occurring while performing lawful activities with caution are excusable. | A carpenter accidentally injures someone despite taking precautions. |
| Section 19 | Harm to Prevent Greater Harm (EARLIER U/S- 81) | Acts done to prevent greater harm, without criminal intent, are excusable. | A ship captain alters course to avoid a collision, risking minor damage to another vessel. |
| Section 20 & 21 | Acts by Children (EARLIER U/S- 82) | Children under 7 are incapable of committing a crime; those between 7-12 are liable only if they understand their actions. | A 6-year-old accidentally breaks a valuable item. |
| Section 22 | Acts by the Mentally Unsound (EARLIER U/S- 83) | Mentally incapable individuals are not criminally responsible for their actions. | A person suffering from a severe mental disorder accidentally harms another. |
| Section 23 | Involuntary Intoxication (EARLIER U/S- 84) | Acts committed under involuntary intoxication are not criminal offenses. | A person is drugged against their will and commits a crime while intoxicated. |
| Section 25 | Acts Done Without Malice but With Consent (EARLIER U/S- 85) | Harm done without malice and with consent is not an offense. | Two friends fencing for fun, one gets injured unintentionally. |
| Section 26 & 27 | Acts for Another’s Benefit (EARLIER U/S- 86) | Acts done in good faith for someone’s benefit, with their consent or guardian’s, are not offenses. | A doctor performs risky surgery with patient or guardian consent. |
| Section 28 | Invalid Consent (EARLIER U/S- 87) | Consent given under fear, misconception, or by someone incapable (e.g., intoxicated or underage) is invalid. | A minor gives consent to a risky activity, but it is not legally valid. |
| Section 29 | Independent Crimes Despite Consent (EARLIER U/S- 88) | Some acts, like causing a miscarriage, remain crimes even with consent. | A person agrees to a criminal act like an illegal medical procedure. |
| Section 30 | Emergency Acts Without Consent (EARLIER U/S- 89) | Acts done in emergencies for someone’s benefit without consent are excusable. | A doctor performs life-saving surgery on an unconscious patient. |
| Section 31 | Good Faith Communication (EARLIER U/S- 93) | Harm caused by good faith communication is excusable. | A doctor informs a patient of a terminal illness, leading to emotional harm. |
| Section 32 | Acts Done Under Immediate Threat (EARLIER U/S- 94) | Acts committed under threat of immediate death, except for serious crimes, are excusable. | A person robs a bank under threat of death from a criminal. |
| Section 33 | Trivial Harm (EARLIER U/S- 95) | Minor harm that would not be reasonable to complain about is not a crime. | A slight bump in a crowded area doesn’t count as an offense. |
Criminal law recognizes that not all injurious acts are performed with the intent to commit a crime, as evidenced by its broad exceptions. These sections offer protections for anyone operating in good faith, under duress, or as a result of honest errors. They make sure that no one is unjustly punished for mishaps, bad luck, or deeds carried out for the benefit of society. These exceptions support equal treatment in the legal system by taking the intent and circumstances into account and acknowledging that human behavior is complicated and sometimes cannot be assessed solely by its results. We can better appreciate the balance between justice and compassion in the law when we are aware of these exceptions.
SOURCE – PRSIndia
READ ALSO – PUNISHMENTS UNDER BNS (SECTION 4-13)
