CRIMINAL FORCE AND ASSAULT (SECTIONS 128–136) UNDER BNS

by | Apr 2, 2026

Criminal force and assault under BNS Sections 128 to 136 showing key concepts and legal distinctions.

Article explaining force, criminal force, and assault under Sections 128–136 of BNS.


CRIMINAL FORCE AND ASSAULT (SECTIONS 128–136) UNDER BNS


The law relating to force, criminal force, and assault protects individuals from unlawful physical interference, threats, and violations of personal dignity under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) . These provisions are fundamental because they address common forms of aggression—ranging from minor physical contact to serious threats and obstruction of public servants. Sections 128 to 136 define these offences, clarify their essential ingredients, and prescribe punishments depending on the intention, nature of act, and surrounding circumstances.

 

Section 128 – Use of Force

Definition: A person is said to use force when they:

  • Cause motion, change of motion, or cessation of motion to another person; or
  • Cause any substance to come into contact with another person or their belongings;

Such force may be caused:

  1. By one’s own bodily power
  2. By arranging objects to move without further action
  3. By inducing an animal

ExampleThrowing a stone or splashing water on someone intentionally.

Case Law

  • State of Maharashtra vs. Mohd. Yakub (1980)The Supreme Court clarified that force includes indirect physical acts, meaning even causing an object to move and touch a person amounts to force.

Section 129 – Criminal Force

Definition: A person uses criminal force when:

  • They intentionally use force
  •  Without the other person’s consent
  • With the intention to commit an offence, or to cause injury, fear, or annoyance

Essential Ingredients

  • Intention
  • Absence of consent
  • Likelihood of harm, fear, or annoyance

ExamplePulling someone’s clothes to insult or harass them.

Case Law

  • Rupan Deol Bajaj vs. KPS Gill (1995)The Supreme Court held that even a single act like slapping, if done with improper intent, constitutes criminal force and violates dignity.

Section 130 – Assault

Definition: An assault is committed when a person:

  • Makes a gesture or preparation
  • Intending or knowing it is likely to cause apprehension
  • That criminal force is about to be used

Note: Words alone do not amount to assault unless combined with gestures.

Example Raising a hand or weapon in a threatening manner.

Case Law

  • Queen vs. St. George (1840)Pointing an unloaded gun was held to be assault because it created a reasonable fear of immediate harm.

Section 131 – Punishment for Assault or Criminal Force

Provision: Whoever commits assault or uses criminal force (without grave and sudden provocation) shall be punished with:

  • Imprisonment up to 3 months, or
  • Fine up to ₹1000, or
  • Both

Example Pushing someone intentionally during an argument.

Case Law

  • Jagannath Shah vs. State of West Bengal (1969) The court held that even minor acts like pushing or slapping fall under this section if done intentionally without justification.

Section 132 – Assault or Criminal Force to Deter Public Servant

Definition: Whoever assaults or uses criminal force against a public servant:

  • While performing duty, or
  • To prevent or deter them from duty, or
  • In retaliation for their lawful acts

Punishment

  • Imprisonment up to 2 years, or
  • Fine, or
  • Both

ExampleAttacking a police officer during an arrest.

Case Law

  • State of Punjab vs. Major Singh (1967)The court emphasized the need for strict protection of public servants, as obstruction affects public administration.

Section 133 – Assault with Intent to Dishonour

Definition : Whoever assaults or uses criminal force:

  • With the intention to dishonour a person
  • Without grave and sudden provocation

Punishment

  • Imprisonment up to 2 years, or
  • Fine, or
  • Both

ExamplePublicly pulling someone’s clothes to humiliate them.

Case Law

  • Ramkripal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2007)The Supreme Court held that intention to insult or humiliate is the crucial element for this offence.

Section 134 – Assault in Attempt to Commit Theft

Definition : Whoever assaults or uses criminal force:

  • While attempting to commit theft
  • Of property worn or carried by a person

Punishment

  • Imprisonment up to 2 years, or
  • Fine, or
  • Both

ExampleSnatching a chain or bag using force.

Case Law

  • Phool Kumar vs. Delhi Administration (1975) The court clarified that use of force during theft increases gravity and may amount to robbery depending on facts.

Section 135 – Assault to Wrongfully Confine

Definition : Whoever assaults or uses criminal force:

  • With the intention to wrongfully confine a person

Punishment

  • Imprisonment up to 1 year, or
  • Fine up to ₹5000, or
  • Both

Example- Forcibly locking someone inside a room or restricting movement.

Case Law

  • State of Gujarat vs. Keshavlal (1992)Even temporary restraint using force was held sufficient to constitute wrongful confinement.

Section 136 – Assault on Grave and Sudden Provocation

Definition: Whoever assaults or uses criminal force:

  • On account of grave and sudden provocation

Punishment

  • Imprisonment up to 1 month, or
  • Fine up to ₹1000, or
  • Both

Important Conditions

Provocation is not valid if:

  • Self-induced
  • Due to lawful acts
  • Due to private defence

Example Immediate physical reaction after serious insult.

Case Law

  • K.M. Nanavati vs. State of Maharashtra (1962) The court explained that provocation must be grave, sudden, and cause loss of self-control, with no time for cooling down.

Discover insights on Latin Maxims and Legal Glossary and simplify complex legal terms in seconds.The LawGist ensures exam success with quality Blogs and Articles on Top Legal Picks (TLP), Current Affairs, latest Supreme Court judgments as Courtroom Chronicles. Backed by trusted resources and videos, The LawGist is every Professionals and Aspirant’s first choice. Discover more at thelawgist.org

Conclusion

Sections 128–136 provide a comprehensive framework distinguishing:

  • Force (basic physical act)
  • Criminal Force (intentional unlawful force)
  • Assault (threat creating fear of force)

These provisions emphasize:

  • Consent and intention as key elements
  • Protection of human dignity and personal liberty
  • Special safeguards for public servants and vulnerable situations

Judicial interpretations have strengthened these provisions by clarifying that even minor acts, if intentional and insulting, can amount to offences. At the same time, the law balances justice by recognizing grave and sudden provocation in appropriate cases.


Sec. Offence Key Point Punishment Example
128 Force Causing motion/contact Throwing stone
129 Criminal Force Intent + No consent + Harm Pulling clothes
130 Assault Fear of force (no contact) Raising hand to hit
131 Simple Assault No grave provocation 3 months / ₹1000 Pushing
132 Public Servant Force to deter duty 2 years Attacking police
133 Dishonour Intent to insult 2 years Public humiliation
134 Theft + Force Force during theft 2 years Chain snatching
135 Confinement Force to restrict movement 1 year / ₹5000 Locking room
136 Provocation Sudden provocation 1 month / ₹1000 Reaction to insult

 

“Where physical force meets unlawful intent, the law steps in to protect dignity, liberty, and personal security.”

 


SOURCE – MHA

Discover insights on Latin Maxims and Legal Glossary and simplify complex legal terms in seconds.The LawGist ensures exam success with quality Blogs and Articles on Top Legal Picks (TLP), Current Affairs, latest Supreme Court judgments as Courtroom Chronicles. Backed by trusted resources and videos, The LawGist is every Professionals and Aspirant’s first choice. Discover more at thelawgist.org

 

Written By Nancy Sharma

I am Nancy Mahavir Sharma, a passionate legal writer and a judicial service aspirant who is interested in legal researching and writing. I have completed Latin Legum Magister degree. I have been writing from past few years and I am excited to share my legal thoughts and opinions here. I believe that everyone has the potential to make a difference.

Related Posts