DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (5 MARCH 2025)

by | Mar 5, 2025

Supreme Court orders time-bound action on forest conservation, healthcare infrastructure, and climate change policy.

Supreme Court mandates urgent compliance on forest conservation, healthcare policy, and climate action, stressing state accountability and sustainable governance.


DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (5 MARCH 2025)


SUPREME COURT DIRECTS STATES/UTS TO FORM EXPERT COMMITTEES FOR IDENTIFYING FOREST AREAS

Case Name: Ashok Kumar Sharma, Indian Forest Service (Retd.) & Ors. vs. Union of India & Anr.

If states or UTs do not form expert panels to identify forest areas within a month, the Supreme Court is considering taking severe action. It placed a strong emphasis on the accountability of chief secretaries and administrators by requiring adherence to Rule 16(1) of the Van Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan Rules 2023 within six months.

Legal Provision
  • Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Rules, 2023: Rule 16(1): Requires states/UTs to consolidate records of forest-like areas.
  • Forest Conservation Act, 1980 (Amended 2023): Governs forest land diversion and conservation.
  • TN Godavarman Thirumalpad vs. Union of India (1996): defined “forest” and mandated protection.

Source: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT CRITICIZES STATES FOR FAILURE TO DEVELOP PUBLIC HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE

Case Name: Siddharth Dalmia & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) No. 337/2018

The Supreme Court criticized the States for not having proper health infrastructure. The Apex Court highlighted the lacunae in the department. The Court also mentioned the role of private institutions in the healthcare field; due to the incapabilities of the state to provide the same, private institutions are flourishing. Recently, while hearing the case before the Supreme Court, the Apex Court criticized the state for not having proper health care infrastructure in states and even highlighted how lacunae provided private institutions with an opportunity to flourish in the healthcare sector. The Court asked if a strict regulation on private hospitals might discourage investment within healthcare, as it also noted states’ liabilities under Article 21 and Directive Principles. The states were advised to formulate adequate policies.

Legal Provision

Source: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT FLAGS INSTITUTIONAL GAPS IN INDIA’S CLIMATE POLICIES

Case Name: Ridhima Pandey vs. Union of India,

The Supreme Court underscored enhanced coordination of ministries while highlighting institutional shortcomings in Indian climate policies. It called for revisiting environmental regulations to make them climate-centric. Referring to the urgency of taking concerted climate action and enforcing regulations, the Court asked eight key ministries to submit responses.

Legal Provision 
  • Environment Protection Act, 1986: Governs pollution control and environmental safeguards.
  • Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981: Regulates air quality management.
  • Paris Agreement, 2015: India’s commitment to reducing carbon emissions.

Source: Supreme Court of India

Also Read: DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (4 MARCH 2025)

 

 

 

 

 

Written By Vishakha Khatri

My name is Vishakha Khatri. I am an engineering graduate and a civil service aspirant with a passion for spreading knowledge about Indian polity. I believe that understanding our political system is crucial for every citizen, and I am committed to making this information accessible to everyone in my own easy way. Through my experiences in civil service preparation and my unique perspective as an engineering graduate, I hope to inspire and educate others on the importance of Indian polity.

Related Posts