Headline
The Supreme Court of India questions the CM N Chandrababu Naidu of Andhra Pradesh on a public claim on substandard ghee at Tirupati Temple.
Summary
The Supreme Court of India condemned Andhra Pradesh CM N Chandrababu Naidu for publicly accusing the previous YSR Congress government of using substandard ghee containing animal fat for making Tirupati temple laddus without evidence. The Supreme court questioned the need for such a statement when an investigation was already underway.
Key Facts
- Case Name: Subramanian Swamy & Ors. vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
- Judges Name: Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan
- CM N Chandrababu Naidu claimed YSR Congress used substandard ghee containing animal fat in it.
- The Supreme Court asked if laddus or ghee samples were tested before the statement of Naidu.
- Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams’ Executive Officer contradicted the CM of Andhra Pradesh.
- No conclusive proof of contaminated ghee was provided to the Supreme Court.
Legal Insights
The Supreme Court of India stressed that sensitive issues, mainly related to faith, must be handled with caution. It questioned the effect of CM Naidu’s public statement on the ongoing Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe.
Impact
The Supreme Court of India warned that such premature statements without evidence could hurt public sentiment and interfere with the integrity of the investigation.
Why it Matters
It showcases the significance of political figures exercising restraint in sensitive matters, by making sure that religious issues are kept away from public controversy without proper evidence.
Source:
