Headline
The Supreme Court of India erased the adverse comments against advocates for violation of natural justice.
Summary
The Supreme Court of India set aside adverse remarks and disciplinary directions made by the l High Court of Uttarakhand against advocate Dushyant Mainali, quoting violation of natural justice.
Key Facts
- Case Name: Dushyant Mainali vs. Diwan Singh Bora & Anr.
- Judges Name: Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan.
- Uttarakhand High Court in a civil case recorded adverse remarks against Dushyant Mainali.
- The appellant was neither a party to the case nor displaying any litigant.
- The High Court accused him of professional misconduct and ordered the State Bar Council to start proceedings without hearing him.
Legal Insights
The Supreme Court of India restated the fundamental principle that “no one can be criticised unheard,” emphasizing judicial restraint. It quoted earlier cases where the same kind of unwarranted remarks were made.
Impact
The ruling of the Supreme Court reaffirms the obligation of the judiciary to stick to principles of fairness ,justness and natural justice.
Why It Matters
This decision upholds rights of advocates’ to a fair and just hearing and showcases the requirement for courts to exercise caution when making adverse observations.
Source:
Also read – SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS LAND OWNERSHIP & REJECTED ADVERSE POSSESSION CLAIM IN FAMILY DISPUTE
