SUPREME COURT CANCELS BAIL IN FAKE LL.B. DEGREE RACKET CASE 

by | Feb 13, 2026

 Supreme Court of India cancelling bail in forged LLB degree racket case 2026.

Supreme Court annuls bail granted in alleged fake LL.B. degree and academic forgery racket case (2026 INSC 144).


SUPREME COURT CANCELS BAIL IN FAKE LL.B. DEGREE RACKET CASE 


CASE SUMMARY – In Zeba Khan vs. State of U.P. & Others (2026 INSC 144), the Supreme Court of India annulled a High Court order granting bail to an accused allegedly involved in forging an LL.B. degree and operating an organized fake academic certificate racket. The Court held that the High Court ignored crucial evidence, including university communications denying issuance of the degree and suppression of nine criminal cases. Emphasizing that appellate courts can annul perverse bail orders without requiring supervening circumstances, the Court distinguished between cancellation and appeal against grant of bail. While cancelling bail, the Court declined transfer of investigation as chargesheet had already been filed.


ASPECTS DETAILS
Case Title Zeba Khan vs. State of U.P. & Others
Introduction Appeal against grant of bail to Respondent accused of forging LL.B. degree and running an organized fake academic qualification racket.
Factual Background FIR No. 314/2024 alleged fabrication of LL.B. degree purportedly from Sarvodaya Group of Institutions affiliated to Veer Bahadur Singh Purvanchal University. University denied affiliation and issuance of degree. Accused allegedly used forged degree to practice as advocate and facilitate fake degrees for others.
Legal Issues
  1. Whether High Court erred in granting bail?
  2. Whether suppression of criminal antecedents vitiates bail?
  3. Whether investigation should be transferred to special agency?
Applicable Law
  1. Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC;
  2. Article 136 Constitution of India;
  3. Bail jurisprudence principles from precedents including Neeru Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ash Mohammad v. Shiv Raj Singh
Analysis SC held High Court ignored material evidence, criminal antecedents (9 FIRs), university communications, and suppression of facts. Bail order found perverse and legally unsustainable. Distinction reiterated between cancellation and annulment of bail.
Conclusion Bail granted by High Court set aside. Investigation transfer denied as chargesheet already filed and no exceptional circumstances shown.
Current Scenario Respondent’s enrolment removed by Bar Council; trial to proceed; bail cancelled by Supreme Court.

 

“Bail discretion must align with judicial discipline; suppression of criminal antecedents vitiates liberty.”

 

SOURCE – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

READ ALSO – Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC

 

Discover insighs on Latin Maxims and Legal Glossary and simplify complex legal terms in seconds.The LawGist ensures exam success with quality Blogs and Articles on — Top Legal Picks (TLP), Current Affairslatest Supreme Court judgments as Courtroom ChroniclesBacked by trusted resources and videos, The LawGist is every Professionals and Aspirant’s first choice. Discover more at thelawgist.org

 


 

 

Written By Nancy Sharma

I am Nancy Mahavir Sharma, a passionate legal writer and a judicial service aspirant who is interested in legal researching and writing. I have completed Latin Legum Magister degree. I have been writing from past few years and I am excited to share my legal thoughts and opinions here. I believe that everyone has the potential to make a difference.

Related Posts