Law student Rakshit Chaurasia, accused in Vadodara hit-and-run, claims innocence as police investigate overspeeding and possible drunk driving in fatal crash.
HEADLINE
Rakshit Chaurasia, a law student, alleged in the Vadodara car accident which resulted in one death and four injured, argues that he was not drunk driving. He claims the potholes caused him to lose control and resulted in to this car accident
SUMMARY
Vadodara-tat vaan dukhda sadbhavna, a mar Ekan death of a lone female and four other casualties while a blazing car mercilessly collided with various cars. Law student, Rakshit Chaurasia, claimed he had little alcohol in his system and lost control due to potholes on the road. Witnesses and videos, however, tell a different story and this raises questions on legal accountability, especially in road safety issues.
KEY ASPECTS
- Incident Details: The accident took place at Muktanand cross roads in Vadodara around 12:30 AM.
- Accused: The accused driver, Rakshit Chaurasia, is a 23-year-old studying law.
- Casualties: One lady, Hemali Patel, died; four others were injured.
- Eyewitness Accounts: The witnesses alleged that Chaurasia was inebriated and singing ‘Another round, another round’.
- Police Action: Chaurasia was arrested, and his friend Mit Chauhan, the owner of the car, was also arrested.
- CCTV & Video Evidence: The footage shows the car speeding and dragging the victims.
LEGAL INSIGHTS
- Charges: Section 105 of BNS: Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder(5-10 years imprisonment)
- Possible Charges: There can be other charges on Chaurasia under IPC sections 304A (causing death by negligence), 279 (rash driving) and 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act (drunk driving).
- Burden of Proof: The police have to prove on some medical grounds and witness statement whether Chaurasia was under intoxication.
- Precedents: The similarities in hit and runs, such as that in Pune, raise the issue of how lenient the punishments are for reckless and rash driving.
- Owner’s Liability: Shreya was the owner of the car and so can also be liable under vicarious liability.
IMPACT
- Road Safety Issues: Reckless driving and its effects upon passengers have been the basis for increased attention.
- Public Outrage: Social media commentators have scrutinized the justice system, pointing out how the accused was given media access on the side despite being in custody.
- Legal Precedents: This case may influence future precedents on drunk driving and road accident liability.
- Victim’s Family: The family of the deceased seeks justice in this case and is urging authorities to act strongly against the perpetrators.
WHY IT MATTERS
- Juridical Responsibility: The future of this case will create a precedent for other such cases.
- Public Safety: Shows an imminent need for stricter enforcement of traffic laws.
- Societal Responsibility: Raises questions about privilege and access to media for those accused.
- Legal Reforms: May prompt debate and discussions over stronger penalties for the offense of reckless driving.
SOURCE – Instagram
ALSO READ– OFFENCES AFFECTING LIFE (SECTION 100-113)
