SC HOLDS INSURER LIABLE IN UTILITY VEHICLE ACCIDENT CASE 

by | Sep 8, 2025

Supreme Court of India judgment on insurance liability in Shyam Lal vs Shriram General Insurance case 2025.

Supreme Court clarifies insurer liability in utility vehicle accident case (2025).


SC HOLDS INSURER LIABLE IN UTILITY VEHICLE ACCIDENT CASE 


CASE SUMMARY  – In Shyam Lal v. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. (2025), the Supreme Court dealt with liability concerning a Mahindra Bolero Camper utility van involved in a fatal accident. The High Court had directed “pay and recover,” holding that the insurance policy did not cover passengers. The Supreme Court clarified that the vehicle was a contract carriage with seating for 4+1 and not a goods vehicle, thus covered by insurance. It found no misuse proven and held the insurer liable to indemnify fully. The Tribunal’s award was restored with a minor modification of deducting one-third towards personal expenses in one claim.


ASPECTS DETAILS
Case Title Shyam Lal vs. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others
Introduction Appeal by vehicle owner against High Court’s “pay and recover” order concerning liability of insurer for accident claims.
Factual Background Accident involving a Mahindra Bolero Camper utility van led to multiple deaths and injuries. Claims were filed under MACT. High Court ordered insurer to pay and recover from owner.
Legal Issues
  1. Whether the utility vehicle was covered under “Limitation as to Use” clause, restricting passenger liability. 
  2. Whether insurer can avoid liability citing misuse/overloading.
Applicable Law
  1. Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Sec. 2(7) (Contract Carriage),
  2. Sec. 2(14) (Goods Carriage);
  3. Insurance Policy terms;
  4. Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923.
Analysis SC held utility van registered as 4+1 passengers, contract carriage, not goods vehicle. Policy covered passengers. No valid ground for “pay and recover.” Evidence confirmed 4 passengers + pedestrians.
Conclusion High Court order set aside. Insurer held liable to indemnify fully. Only modification: 1/3rd deduction for personal expenses in one award (MACT Case No. 134/2014).
Current Scenario Appeals allowed, Tribunal’s award restored with minor modification. Liability remains with Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.

 

“A utility vehicle registered as a contract carriage cannot be treated as a goods vehicle; insurer cannot wriggle out of liability.”

 

SOURCE – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

READ ALSOSC DISMISSES APPEAL IN  INSURANCE DEATH COMPENSATION CASE

Discover powerful Latin Maxims and Legal Glossary and simplify complex legal terms in seconds.The LawGist ensures exam success with quality Blogs and Articles — Top Legal Picks (TLP), Current AffairsRecent Supreme Court Judgments, and Step into the world of justice with Courtroom Chronicles. Backed by trusted resources and videos, The LawGist is every Professionals and Aspirant’s first choice. Discover more at thelawgist.org.

 

Written By Nancy Sharma

I am Nancy Mahavir Sharma, a passionate legal writer and a judicial service aspirant who is interested in legal researching and writing. I have completed Latin Legum Magister degree. I have been writing from past few years and I am excited to share my legal thoughts and opinions here. I believe that everyone has the potential to make a difference.

Related Posts