CASE SUMMARY – This case involves a property dispute where Vishnu Vardhan accuses Reddy of fraudulently securing sole ownership of jointly purchased land to claim full compensation from NOIDA. The Supreme Court scrutinized Reddy’s actions, noting contradictory legal claims, unauthorized PoA use, and suppression of vital facts before courts. Reddy allegedly manipulated proceedings to exclude co-owners and acquired unjust compensation. The Court found prima facie fraud, restrained Reddy from creating third-party interests, and mandated disclosure of asset investments. Pending final orders, the case reflects crucial principles on fraud, finality of litigation, and judicial integrity.
| ASPECTS | DETAILS |
| Case Title | Vishnu Vardhan @ Vishnu Pradhan vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. |
| Introduction | Allegations of fraud by Reddy in legal proceedings to claim sole ownership and compensation for jointly owned land. |
| Factual Background | Joint land purchase by Vishnu, Reddy & Sudhakar in 1997; subsequent disputes; execution of multiple agreements and suits between parties; alleged fraudulent compromise decree; Reddy’s claim of sole ownership and compensation; parallel proceedings in civil, writ, and Supreme Court. |
| Legal Issues |
|
| Applicable Law |
|
| Analysis | The Court finds that Reddy suppressed material facts and obtained a favorable High Court order by omitting to include necessary parties and misrepresenting ownership. Fraud identified; trial court compromise decree held suspect. |
| Conclusion | Fraud vitiates the High Court’s impugned order; matter requires correction. Reddy restrained; directions for disclosures issued. |
| Current Scenario | Pending further orders; Court directed Reddy to furnish asset details and restrained third-party dealings; proceedings tagged and heard by larger Bench; final judgment reserved. |
“Fraud unravels everything – no decree obtained by deception can survive the scrutiny of law.”
SOURCE – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
READ ALSO – Articles 32, 129, 142 of Constitution
