
Supreme Court restores jurisdiction of Special Courts in NDPS cases — Denash v. State of Tamil Nadu (2025).
SUPREME COURT ALLOWS INTERIM CUSTODY OF SEIZED VEHICLE UNDER NDPS ACT
CASE SUMMARY – In Denash vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2025 INSC 1258), the Supreme Court held that the NDPS Rules, 2022 do not override the parent NDPS Act regarding disposal of seized vehicles. Denash, whose lorry was used by drivers to transport Ganja without his knowledge, sought interim custody. The Court ruled that only Special Courts, not the Drug Disposal Committee, can adjudicate such matters under Sections 451 and 457 CrPC (now BNSS). It emphasized protection for innocent owners against confiscation without due process. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court’s order and directing release of the vehicle on conditions.
| ASPECTS | DETAILS |
| Case Title | Denash vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Criminal Appeal (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 8698 of 2025) |
| Introduction | Appeal against the Madras High Court order denying interim custody (supurdagi) of a seized lorry under the NDPS Act. |
| Factual Background | The appellant’s lorry, transporting 29,400 MT of iron sheets, was intercepted by police, discovering 6 kg of Ganja concealed by the driver and others. The appellant (owner) was not an accused. Both the Special Court and High Court denied interim release citing the NDPS Rules, 2022. |
| Legal Issues |
|
| Applicable Law |
|
| Analysis | The Supreme Court held that the 2022 Rules are subordinate legislation and cannot override the NDPS Act. Confiscation and interim release of vehicles fall under judicial authority of Special Courts, not the Drug Disposal Committee. It reaffirmed that an innocent owner who lacked knowledge or connivance cannot be deprived of property. |
| Conclusion | The Supreme Court set aside the Madras High Court judgment, allowing interim custody of the lorry to the appellant on conditions imposed by the Special Court. |
| Current Scenario | The judgment clarifies the law on interim custody under NDPS Act post-2022 Rules, restoring jurisdiction of Special Courts and safeguarding property rights of bona fide vehicle owners. |
“Rules cannot override the parent statute; Special Courts retain jurisdiction for interim custody of seized vehicles.”
SOURCE – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
READ ALSO – BNSS (formerly CrPC) Sections 497 & 503
Discover insighs on Latin Maxims and Legal Glossary and simplify complex legal terms in seconds.The LawGist ensures exam success with quality Blogs and Articles on — Top Legal Picks (TLP), Current Affairs, latest Supreme Court judgments as Courtroom Chronicles. Backed by trusted resources and videos, The LawGist is every Professionals and Aspirant’s first choice. Discover more at thelawgist.org






