Headline
The Supreme Court of India condemns DHCBA’s Opposition to Reservation of Women.
Summary
The Supreme Court of India condemns the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) for rejecting proposals for women reservation, expressing its behavior as “pathetic.” The case seeks to introduce reservation for women up to 33% in bar associations across Delhi.
Key Facts
- Case Name: Aditi Chaudhary vs. Bar Council of Delhi and Ors.
- Judges Name: Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
- The Supreme Court of India had advised reserving 4 out of 10 Executive Committee posts for women, but the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) rejected the proposal.
- A video of the General Body Meeting revealed that male members were aggressively opposing reservation for women.
- Next Hearing: Scheduled for November 29, 2024 with a “cooling-off period” of 1 week.
Legal Insights
The case highlights the Supreme Court’s push for equality and inclusion, challenging systemic gender bias in professional bodies.
Impact
A decision of the Supreme Court of India showing favor for reservation for women could set a national precedent for gender representation in legal and professional organizations.
Why It Matters
The case highlights the serious requirement for equal representation in decision-making bodies, pointing to addressing long-standing gender disparity in the legal profession.
Source:
