Supreme Court rules that police must protect free speech under Article 19(1)(a) and follow constitutional duties.
Are Police Officers Constitutionally Bound?
The Supreme Court of India in the case of Imran Pratapgadhi vs. State of Gujarat stated that police must safeguard freedom of expression under Article 19(1)(a) of Indian Constitution and follow constitutional ideals. The bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan quashed an FIR against MP Imran Pratapgarhi by stressing on the requirement for police sensitization.
Case Overview
An FIR was lodged against Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi by Gujarat Police for an Instagram post featuring a poem. He was booked under Sections 196, 197, 299, 302 and 57 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The Supreme Court stated that police must conduct a preliminary inquiry before registering FIRs for speech connected offences.
Key Aspects
The Supreme Court stressed that officers must read or hear the alleged offensive speech before filing an FIR. It stated that failure to conduct a preliminary inquiry can cause violations of fundamental rights. The ruling stressed that while Article 19(2) permits restrictions on free speech they must be justified and reasonable.
Legal Insights
- Article 12 acknowledges police as part of the State who is bound to uphold the Constitution of India.
- Article 19(1)(a) gives freedom of speech and expression to all citizens.
- Article 51A(a) tells that respect for the Constitution and its ideals.
- Article 19(2) permits reasonable restrictions on free speech but they must not be arbitrary.
- Police must conduct a preliminary inquiry under Section 173(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) before registering FIRs for speechrelated offences.
Impact
This judgment strengthens free speech protections by stopping misuse of criminal laws against political dissent. It shows the requirement for police training on constitutional obligations and reinforces the right to express opinions freely.
What Next?
States must train police officers on their constitutional duties to stop unlawful FIRs in speech-related cases. Future cases may establish clearer directives on police discretion in speech connected offences.
Final Verdict
The ruling of the Supreme Court in Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat reaffirms the constitutional duty of the police to safeguard fundamental rights so that free speech remains safeguarded under Article 19(1)(a).
Source
