Headline
The Supreme Court Of India rejected the Plea for Virtual Hearing Facilities in All District Courts.
Summary
The Supreme Court of India dismissed the petition seeking to mandate that all district courts have virtual hearing facilities, referring to the difficulty and diversity of India’s judicial system.
Key Facts
- Case Name: Kishan Chand Jain vs. Union of India
- Name of Judges: Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra
- The plea sought for district courts nationwide to have virtual hearing and evening courts.
- The Supreme Court said that such issues are part of the e-Courts project and cannot be uniformly mandated by judicial orders.
Legal Insights
The Supreme Court of India stressed that judicial infrastructure of India varies across regions, making a blanket order impractical.Judicial decisions cannot drive technical enhancement , which are being handled through e-Courts projects
Impact
The Supreme Court decision showcases the Court’s deference to High Courts and existing technological projects in executing upgrades suited to local needs.
Why It Matters
It focuses on the freedom of High Courts in handling funds and executing technological advancements, based on regional requirements.
Source:
