HIGH COURT DELAYED BAIL 27 TIMES SAYS SUPREME COURT

by | May 23, 2025

Alt Text (under 125 characters): Supreme Court criticizes High Court for repeated bail delays, grants relief.

Supreme Court grants bail after 27 adjournments, affirming that liberty must not suffer due to judicial delay.

Case in News

HIGH COURT DELAYED BAIL 27 TIMES SAYS SUPREME COURT in a case where personal liberty was overlooked .

Case Overview 

Case Name : Lakshya Tawar vs Central Bureau of Investigation 

In a significant order the Supreme Court of India came down heavily on the Allahabad High Court for delaying the hearing of a bail plea 27 times . The petitioner incarcerated for over four years filed a special leave petition seeking urgent relief . The Bench comprising Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Justice AG Masih, highlighted how such delays in bail decisions infringe the fundamental right to personal liberty .

Key Aspects 

The Court took strong exception to the procedural delays that kept the accused behind bars . Here are the core facts and legal issues that shaped the Court’s decision :

  • The High Court adjourned the bail matter 27 times without a decision .
  • The petitioner was in custody for over 3 years and 8 months .
  • Only 3 out of 365 witnesses had been examined .
  • A High Court order dated March 20, 2025, only directed evidence recording—not bail .
  • The petitioner faces 33 cases, but is on bail in 27 of them .

Legal Insights

The case raised pressing constitutional concerns relating to bail, trial delays, and liberty. The Court relied on the following legal principles :

  • Article 21 The prolonged incarceration violated the right to personal liberty .
  • Article 14 – Unjustified delays amounted to arbitrary treatment .
  • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – The petitioner is accused under this statute .
  • Bail principles – Delayed trials and long custody are key grounds for granting bail .

Court’s Verdict 

The SupremeCourt granted bail, observing that repeated adjournments in matters concerning personal liberty are unacceptable . The pending bail application in the High Court was declared infructuous . The Court stressed that liberty cannot be compromised due to judicial delays .

 

Source- Supreme Court of India 

Read also Article 21 of Indian Constitution 

 

 

 

 

Written By Archana Singh

I am Archana Singh, a recent law master's graduate with a strong aspiration for the judicial service. My passion lies in elucidating complex legal concepts, disseminating legal news, and enhancing legal awareness. I take immense pride in introducing my new legal website - The LawGist. Through my meticulously crafted blogs and articles, I aim to empower individuals with comprehensive legal insights. My unwavering dedication is to facilitate a profound comprehension of the law, enabling people to execute judicious and well-informed choices.

Related Posts