Headline
The Supreme Court of India criticizes filing of frivolous applications u/s 216 of Crpc to alter charges after discharge rejection.
Summary
The Supreme Court of India condemned the accused filing applications under Section 216 Criminal Procedure Code(CrPC) to alter charges after their discharge applications were dismissed, stressing that such actions interrupt criminal trials.
Key Facts
- Case Name: K. Ravi v. State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
- Name of Judges: Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
- Previously denied discharge,the accused altered charges under Section 216 CrPC.
- The Sessions Court dismissed this application of the accused, but the High Court wrongly allowed it.
- The Supreme Court of India reversed the decision of the High Court ,by imposing a penalty of Rs. 50,000 on the respondent.
Legal Insights
The Supreme Court of India shed light that Section 216 of Criminal Procedure Code(Crpc) does not allow the accused the right to seek discharge after charges are already framed, especially after a previous discharge request is denied.
Impact
The ruling of the Supreme Court of India strengthens strict limits on revisional jurisdiction and discourages the strategies that irrelevantly delays criminal proceedings.
Why it Matters
It seeks to control procedural abuses that obstruct the swift administration of justice,by making sure that criminal trials are not hampered by frivolous legal activities .
Source
