ASSESSMENT OF PENALTY AND STAMP DUTY UNDER KARNATAKA STAMP ACT

by Nancy Sharma | Sep 9, 2024

ASPECTS	DETAILS
Case Title	Seetharama Shetty vs Monappa Shetty
Introduction	The case involves a dispute over the possession of agricultural land based on an agreement of sale dated 29.06.1999. The appellant seeks a perpetual injunction against the respondent.
Factual Background	Appellant claims possession under an agreement of sale dated 29.06.1999. Respondent denies executing the agreement and argues it is insufficiently stamped. Trial court directs District Registrar to assess stamp duty and penalty.
Legal Issues	Whether the agreement of sale qualifies as a conveyance under the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. Whether the trial court’s imposition of a tenfold penalty on deficit stamp duty is valid.
Applicable Law	Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957: Sections 33, 34, 37, and 39.
Analysis	Trial court and High Court imposed a tenfold penalty under Section 34. The Supreme Court evaluated if the penalty should be imposed by the court or determined by the District Registrar under Section 39.
Conclusion	The Supreme Court set aside the tenfold penalty and directed the trial court to refer the agreement to the District Registrar for a fresh determination of stamp duty and penalty.
Current Scenario	The appeal was allowed in part, with the case remanded for proper determination of the stamp duty and penalty by the District Registrar.

CASE SUMMARY– In this case, the appellant sought an injunction to protect his possession of land based on an agreement of sale. The respondent disputed the agreement, citing insufficient stamp duty. The trial court imposed a tenfold penalty on the deficit stamp duty. The Supreme Court, however, ruled that the penalty determination should be made by the District Registrar under the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. It set aside the lower courts’ orders, remanding the case for proper determination of the deficit stamp duty and penalty by the District Registrar, thus partially allowing the appeal.

SOURCE – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

← DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (09 SEPTEMBER 2024) REFRESHING MEMORY (SECTION 162-163 OF BSA) →

Written By Nancy Sharma

I am Nancy Mahavir Sharma, a passionate legal writer and , a judicial service aspirant who is interested in legal researching and writing. I have completed Latin Legum Magister degree. I have been writing from past few years and I am excited to share my legal thoughts and opinions here. I believe that everyone has the potential to make a difference.