DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (07 JULY 2026)

by | Jul 7, 2026


DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (07 JULY 2026)


KAPIL SIBAL AND DUSHYANT DAVE CRITIQUE COLLEGIUM SYSTEM, CALL FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTMENT REFORMS

Case Name: Discussion on the Collegium System and Judicial Appointments (Public Interview)

In a public discussion, Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal and Dushyant Dave expressed serious concerns over the functioning of the Collegium system. While Dave described the present framework as having failed to consistently uphold merit, Sibal voiced regret over his role in the landmark Second Judges Case, highlighting concerns about executive influence, transparency, and the independence of the judiciary.

LEGAL PROVISIONS & FRAMEWORK

  • Articles 124 and 217 of the Constitution
  • Second Judges Case (1993)
  • Third Judges Case (1998)
  • Collegium System for judicial appointments
  • Judicial independence doctrine
  • Separation of powers

SC REFUSES TO INTERFERE WITH ORDER DIRECTING REMOVAL OF SHIVAJI MAHARAJ STATUE FROM MORMUGAO PORT LAND

Case Name: Petition concerning Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Statue at Mormugao Port Authority

The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the Bombay High Court’s direction for removal of the Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj statue erected on land belonging to the Mormugao Port Authority. The petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies before the High Court, leaving the existing order undisturbed.

LEGAL PROVISIONS & FRAMEWORK

  • Major Port Authorities Act, 2021
  • Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971
  • Article 136 of the Constitution
  • Public land management principles
  • Rule of law in public property
  • Judicial review

Source: Supreme Court of India

E20 PETROL DEBATE REACHES SC: COURT EXAMINES CONCERNS OVER FUEL POLICY

Case Name: Public Interest Litigation challenging the E20 Petrol Rollout

The Supreme Court continued hearing the challenge to the nationwide rollout of E20 petrol, with petitioners raising concerns over vehicle compatibility, fuel efficiency, and consumer choice. The Union Government defended the policy as a key clean-energy initiative, maintaining that scientific studies support its implementation while broader policy issues remain under judicial consideration.

LEGAL PROVISIONS & FRAMEWORK

  • Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
  • Energy Conservation Act, 2001
  • National Biofuel Policy
  • Consumer protection principles
  • Sustainable development doctrine
  • Judicial review of policy decisions

Source: Supreme Court of India

Also Read: DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (23 JUNE 2026)

 

 

 

Written By Vishakha Khatri

My name is Vishakha Khatri. I am an engineering graduate and a civil service aspirant with a passion for spreading knowledge about Indian polity. I believe that understanding our political system is crucial for every citizen, and I am committed to making this information accessible to everyone in my own easy way. Through my experiences in civil service preparation and my unique perspective as an engineering graduate, I hope to inspire and educate others on the importance of Indian polity.

Related Posts