MADRAS HIGH COURT CONDEMNS VIJAY FOR FLEEING KARUR SITE

by | Oct 6, 2025

Madras High Court condemns Vijay, orders SIT probe into Karur stampede case.

Madras High Court condemns Vijay and TVK leaders for fleeing Karur stampede site and orders SIT probe into the tragedy that claimed 41 lives.

Case in News

Madras High Court condemns Vijay for fleeing Karur site criticising Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) leaders and the State for negligence and missing FIRs in the stampede tragedy .

Discover powerful Latin Maxims and simplify complex legal terms in seconds.

Case Overview

Case Name: PH Dinesh vs. Home Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu

The Madras High Court, led by Justice N Senthil Kumar, harshly criticised Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) and its leader, Vijay, for allegedly fleeing the Karur stampede site where 41 people lost their lives during a political rally on September 27, 2025 . The Court noted the absence of remorse or responsibility from the party leadership and questioned the State Government’s inaction in registering FIRs in related hit-and-run incidents . The bench widened the scope of the case, ordering a probe by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) despite such relief not being sought by the petitioner .

Step into the world of justice with Courtroom Chronicles

Key Aspects

The incident exposed lapses in both political accountability and State investigation . The Court found disturbing evidence of negligence and evasion of duty during a public tragedy .

  • The organisers and Vijay allegedly fled the scene, abandoning supporters .
  • TVK failed to release any official statement showing remorse or responsibility .
  • The State Police did not register FIRs for accidents linked to the event .
  • The Court criticised the lack of suo motu action despite clear video evidence .

Legal Insights

The Court invoked constitutional and criminal law principles to uphold accountability and due process .

  • Article 21 – ensures the right to life, violated by administrative negligence and failure to prevent deaths under Indian Constitution .
  • Article 226 – empowers the Madras High Court to issue directions ensuring justice in extraordinary circumstances .
  • Section 154, CrPC – mandates registration of FIRs even without a formal complaint when cognizable offences occur .
  • The Court applied the doctrine of public accountability to examine both political and administrative failures .

Court’s Verdict

The Madras High Court ordered a Special Investigation Team (SIT) headed by Asra Garg, IGP (North Zone), to probe the Karur stampede. It directed seizure of CCTV footage including visuals from the bus carrying Vijay and ordered the State to cooperate fully . The Court condemned Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam leaders for fleeing and the State for its failure to act promptly emphasising that the judiciary cannot remain a “mute spectator” to such tragedies .

 

Source – Madras High Court

Read alsoIndian Constitution 

The LawGist ensures exam success with quality notes—TPL, Current Affairs, Recent Judgments, and more. Backed by trusted resources and videos, The LawGist is every aspirant’s first choice. Discover more at thelawgist.org.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Written By Archana Singh

I am Archana Singh, a recent law master's graduate with a strong aspiration for the judicial service. My passion lies in elucidating complex legal concepts, disseminating legal news, and enhancing legal awareness. I take immense pride in introducing my new legal website - The LawGist. Through my meticulously crafted blogs and articles, I aim to empower individuals with comprehensive legal insights. My unwavering dedication is to facilitate a profound comprehension of the law, enabling people to execute judicious and well-informed choices.

Related Posts