The Women’s Reservation Bill, officially known as the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (128th Constitutional Amendment Bill),shows a major step in democratic journey of India.With 1/3rd of the seats being reserved in the Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies for women, the purpose of the bill is to amend centuries of gender differences in politics and governance. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar stated , “I assess the progress of a community by the degree of progress which women have achieved.” This legislation shows not just progress for women but for Indian society as a whole.
Since its introduction in 1996, the bill has undergone decades of debates and delays, showing both the challenges and determinations lied to empowerment of women. With its passage in 2023, India confirms its commitment to a future where the voices of women are no longer neglected but honoured at the highest levels of decision-making.Sarojini Naidu stated, “The women of India should have an important role in the legislative councils of the nation. It is not only their right but their duty to help build the fabric of India’s future.”
The bill not only seeks to enlarge gender equality in governance but also incorporates a transformative sight for inclusive leadership. As Prime Minister Narendra Modi showcased, “Nari Shakti is at the core of our societal development.” The Women’s Reservation Bill is more than a piece of legislation; it is a proof to the strength and potential of Indian women to shape the destiny of the nation.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
Early Steps in Women’s Empowerment
India’s commitment to gender equality can be traced back to its Constitution, which promises equal rights to all citizens.It include:
- 1947: Universal adult suffrage was adopted, providing equal voting rights to women.
- 1950: Article 15 of the Indian Constitution prohibited discrimination on the basis of gender, by making sure that women participate in all spheres of life.
Despite these legal provisions, the representation of women in governance remained least. Women’s participation in the Lok Sabha floated around 5–10% for decades, involving policy interference to address systemic hurdles.
AMENDMENTS TO THE WOMEN’S RESERVATION BILL
The 2023 version of the Women’s Reservation Bill, also known as the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (128th Constitutional Amendment Bill), shows the years of legislative efforts to secure reservations for women in the Indian Parliament and state legislatures. It integrates the lessons and provisions of previous drafts and amendments.
- The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments (1992):This amendment mandated a 33% reservation for women in Panchayati Raj institutions and urban local bodies. These amendments were innovative, empowering women at the grassroots level and building the principle of gender-based reservations in the political system of India. This laid the base for the national-level Women’s Reservation Bill.
- The 81st Constitutional Amendment (1996):The 1st official national effort came with the introduction of the 81st Constitutional Amendment Bill in 1996, under the government of Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda. This bill proposed reserving 1/3rd of seats in the Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies for women.But, the bill failed due to political opposition and was not passed.
- The 108th Constitutional Amendment (2008):The UPA government in 2008,announced the 108th Constitutional Amendment Bill, which reserved 1/3rd of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies for women. The bill was passed in 2010 in the Rajya Sabha, but it expired in the Lok Sabha due to lack of political consensus and the dissolution of the 15th Lok Sabha in 2014.
- The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (2023):The 2023 amendment, called the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (128th Constitutional Amendment Bill),made a great development. The bill was passed in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha both and gives reservation of 1/3rd of seats in the Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies for women.Its implementation is accidental upon the completion of the next census and the delimitation exercise, by making sure that the bill aligns with the latest demographic and electoral data.
Thus, the 2023 bill builds on previous attempts, addressing past challenges and setting the stage for substantial gender representation in the political environment of India.
FEATURES
- Reservation of Seats
- 1/3rd of the total seats in the Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies are reserved for only women.
- Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) seats reserved.
- Rotation of Reserved Seats:
- Reserved constituencies will rotate after each delimitation exercise to make sure that there is equitable representation across regions.
- Duration of Reservation:
- The reservation is proposed for a period of 15 years, after which it may be reviewed.
- Commencement of Reservation:
- Implementation will happen only after the fulfillment of the next census and the process of delimitation.
ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR
- Encouraging Gender Equality:By addressing essential hurdles, the bill makes sure that there is equal representation of women in legislative bodies, promoting gender parity in decision-making.
- Empowerment of Women:Increased political participation authorises women to build policies and address matters specific to their requirements, such as healthcare, education, and safety.
- Proven Success of Reservations:The success of the 33% reservation in Panchayati Raj institutions showcases the transformative influence of such measures in increasing participation of women.
- Enhanced Governance:Women’s different outlook enrich the policymaking process, resulting in more bias free and equitable governance.
ARGUMENTS IN AGAINST
- Concerns About Meritocracy: Critics argue that reservation may lead to significant representation,threatening merit-based processes of selection.
- Uniformity of Women: Women are not a homogeneous group.Without sub-reservations for Other Backward Classes (OBC) and minorities, the bill may fail to address the requirements of marginalized women.
- Tokenism: There is a risk that reserved seats may be controlled by women from politically influential families, suspending local leaders.
- Electoral Dynamics:Rotational reservations may shake constituency dynamics, causing frustration among voters and elected representatives.
LANDMARK CASES
- Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan (1997): made standards for the prevention of sexual harassment at the workplace, focusing on gender equality in public spaces.
- Rajbala v. State of Haryana (2015): Upheld educational qualifications required for contesting Panchayat elections, which disproportionately affected women.
- Sabarimala Temple Case (2018): Struck down an decades old ban on women of menstrual age entering the Sabarimala temple, showing gender equality.
- Independent Thought v. Union of India (2017): The right to privacy as a fundamental right was recognised , with important suggestions for freedom of a woman.
- Kishen Pattnayak v. State of Orissa (1989): It highlighted the requirement for proactive policies to ensure representation of women in governance.
- Jijabai v. Pathan Khan (1971): It showcased the constitutional mandate for gender equality in public and private fields.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
- Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (2023): The 128th Constitutional Amendment Bill, passed in 2023, is a remarkable turning point in the journey of the Women’s Reservation Bill. However, its implementation depends on 2 conditions :
- Completion of the Next Census: The provisions of the bill will be enacted after the next nationwide census.
- Delimitation Exercise: Electoral boundaries must be redrafted based on updated population data.
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS
- Rwanda: Leads universally in representation of women, with over 60% of parliamentary seats held by women, achieved through strong quotas.
- Nordic Countries: Consistently high representation of women in politics due to developed gender policies.
- India: Women constitute only about 14% of the Lok Sabha as of 2024, showcasing the emergent requirements or interventions like the Women’s Reservation Bill.
CHALLENGES
- Political Resistance:Despite public support, objection from male legislators and political parties has delayed the passage of the bill for decades.
- Delimitation and Census: The dependency on census data and delimitation exercises may delay implementation,sabotaging the immediate impact of the bill.
- Social and Cultural Hurdles: Deep-rooted patriarchal rules and biases continue to affect active participation of women in politics.
- Judicial Challenges: Legal challenges and disputes over sub-quotas for OBC women may further make the implementation of the bill difficult.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
- 2023: The PM Narendra Modi government suggested reviving the Women’s Reservation Bill. Discussions on gender equality and political empowerment acquired motivation ahead of the 2024 general elections.
- 2024: The bill remains a main agenda item, with extensive public support and renewed calls for its passage.
CRITICAL ANALYSIS ACHIEVEMENTS
- The bill has brought representation of women to the limlight of India’s political discourse.
- It builds on the success of local reservations in Panchayati Raj institutions, which have empowered millions of women.
DEMERITS
- The absence of certains provisions for OBC women has divided certain communities.
- Delays in implementation may reduce the instant impact of the bill, endangering it being recognised as a symbolic gesture.
CONCLUSION
The Women’s Reservation Bill shows a significant step toward addressing gender inequality in Indian politics. By reserving 1/3rd of legislative seats for women, the bill has the capability to change governance and empower millions of women. However, its success depends on productive implementation, political will, and addressing issues like sub-quotas and rotational reservations.
As India dreams to become a universal leader in inclusive governance, the Women’s Reservation Bill gives a chance to make sure that women making nearly half the population have an equal voice in making the future of the nation. By conquering existing challenges, India can pave the way for a more impartial and growing democracy.
Source
