CJI BR Gavai’s calm amid courtroom chaos reflects the strength and dignity of the Supreme Court of India against intolerance.
Case in NewsWhen faith turns to fury in Supreme Court of India, a lawyer attempts attack on CJI BR Gavai . |
Discover powerful Latin Maxims and simplify complex legal terms in seconds.
Case Overview
Case Name: In Re: Attack on Chief Justice of India BR Gavai (2025)
On October 6, 2025, an advocate attempted to throw a shoe at CJI BR Gavai inside the Supreme Court of India . The act followed remarks made by the Chief Justice during a hearing related to restoring a deity’s idol at Khajuraho . Court security immediately intervened, preventing harm . The lawyer shouted religious slogans, signalling an attack not merely on a person but on the institution of the Judiciary itself .
Step into the world of justice with Courtroom Chronicles
Key Aspects
The case highlights the growing intolerance against judicial independence and the misuse of religious sentiments to challenge judicial authority . It reflects how personal beliefs are being weaponised against constitutional institutions meant to uphold the rule of law .
- The incident arose after CJI BR Gavai’s ironic comment: “Go and ask the deity himself.”
- The remark was distorted as an insult to Sanatana Dharma, triggering orchestrated outrage .
- The lawyer attempted to assault the Chief Justice, disrupting court decorum and dignity .
- The act revealed increasing hostility towards the Judiciary and erosion of constitutional faith .
Legal Insights
The incident involves several legal violations safeguarding the sanctity and authority of the Supreme Court of India . The following provisions are relevant :
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 – Section 2(c): Defines criminal contempt as any act that scandalises or lowers the authority of the court .
- Article 129, Constitution of India – Empowers the Supreme Court of India to punish for its own contempt .
- Article 19(2) – Reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech to maintain public order and respect for the Judiciary .
- Advocates Act, 1961 – Section 35: Authorises the Bar Council of India to take disciplinary action against advocates for misconduct .
Court’s Verdict
The Supreme Court of India maintained composure, with CJI BR Gavai continuing the hearing undisturbed . The Bar Council of India immediately suspended the advocate pending disciplinary inquiry . The Chief Justice’s restraint and dignity reaffirmed the resilience of the Judiciary and its unwavering commitment to the Constitution and the rule of law .
Source-Supreme Court of India
Read also- Constitution of India
The LawGist ensures exam success with quality notes—TPL, Current Affairs, Recent Judgments, and more. Backed by trusted resources and videos, The LawGist is every aspirant’s first choice. Discover more at thelawgist.org.
