SUPREME COURT RULING ON REGULARIZATION OF CONTRACTUAL EMPLOYEES IN INDIA

by | Mar 5, 2025

Supreme Court’s ruling on contractual employee regularization, covering case details, legal issues, and final judgment.

Supreme Court’s Key Findings on Contractual Employee Regularization in India


SUPREME COURT RULING ON REGULARIZATION OF CONTRACTUAL EMPLOYEES IN INDIA


ASPECTS DETAILS
Case Title Sports Authority of India & Anr. vs. Dr. Kulbir Singh Rana
Introduction The case deals with the employment rights of physiotherapists hired by SAI under contract and their eligibility for regularization under the 2022 Rules.
Factual Background The respondents were engaged as contractual physiotherapists since 2021. When the 2022 Recruitment Rules were introduced, their contracts were not renewed, and they were excluded from regularization under the “initial constitution” clause. The respondents challenged this decision before the CAT.
Legal Issues
  • Whether the respondents should be considered part of the “initial constitution” under the 2022 Rules.
  • Whether SAI’s recruitment process violated employment rights and fair procedure.
  • Whether SAI could recall its own concession before the Delhi High Court.
Applicable Law
  1. SAI (Sports Sciences & Sports Medicine) Staff Recruitment Rules, 1992
  2. SAI Executive Cadre (Grade A) Staff Recruitment Rules, 2022
  3. Principles of fair employment and service law
Analysis The CAT ruled that the respondents’ appointments were irregular but not illegal, making them eligible for inclusion in the “initial constitution.Delhi High Court upheld this decision and SAI’s own counsel conceded to following the CAT’s ruling.Supreme Court dismissed SAI’s appeal, stating that once a party concedes in court, they cannot later challenge the order.
Conclusion The Supreme Court upheld the CAT and High Court decisions, confirming that the respondents should be regularized under the 2022 Rules. It rejected SAI’s attempt to backtrack on its concession.
Current Scenario The Supreme Court’s ruling means that the respondents must now be treated as regular employees. SAI must comply with the decision and reinstate the affected individuals with full benefits.

CASE SUMMARY – In this case, the employment status of physiotherapists engaged on a contractual basis with the Sports Authority of India (SAI). The respondents, including Dr. Kulbir Singh Rana, challenged their exclusion from the “initial constitution” under the 2022 SAI Recruitment Rules. The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) ruled in their favor, directing SAI to consider them as regular employees. The Delhi High Court upheld this decision. However, SAI attempted to recall the order, which was dismissed. The Supreme Court affirmed the CAT’s ruling, rejecting SAI’s challenge and confirming that the respondents should be deemed regular employees under the 2022 Rules.

“The Supreme Court upholds the rights of contractual employees, ensuring fair recruitment and regularization under Indian employment laws.”

SOURCE –SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

 

 

 

Written By Nancy Sharma

I am Nancy Mahavir Sharma, a passionate legal writer and a judicial service aspirant who is interested in legal researching and writing. I have completed Latin Legum Magister degree. I have been writing from past few years and I am excited to share my legal thoughts and opinions here. I believe that everyone has the potential to make a difference.

Related Posts