SUPREME COURT QUASHES FIR AGAINST BADMINTON STARS CHIRAG AND LAKSHYA SEN

by | Jul 29, 2025

 Supreme Court verdict on Chirag Sen and Lakshya Sen age fraud FIR case.

Supreme Court clears Chirag and Lakshya Sen in age-fraud case, calls FIR “vindictive and abusive”.


SUPREME COURT QUASHES FIR AGAINST BADMINTON STARS CHIRAG AND LAKSHYA SEN


In Chirag Sen & Anr vs. State of Karnataka & Anr, the Supreme Court quashed a 2022 FIR accusing badminton players Chirag and Lakshya Sen of age fraud for age-restricted tournaments. The FIR was based on a 1996 GPF form lacking authenticity. The Court noted prior closure of similar allegations by the CVC and Sports Authority of India, deeming the complaint vindictive and a misuse of legal process. The Court emphasized no prima facie offence existed under IPC Sections 420, 468, or 471, and ruled that further proceedings would amount to abuse of the criminal justice system.


ASPECTS DETAILS
Case Title Chirag Sen and Another vs. State of Karnataka and Another
Introduction The appeal arises from the High Court of Karnataka’s refusal to quash criminal proceedings related to alleged falsification of birth records.
Factual Background Allegations were made in 2022 that players Chirag and Lakshya Sen misrepresented their birth dates to qualify for age-based badminton tournaments.
Legal Issues Whether the FIR alleging forgery, cheating, and conspiracy against the appellants is tenable despite previous administrative closure.
Applicable Law
  1. Sections 420, 468, 471, and 34 IPC
  2. Article 226 & 227 Constitution of India; 
  3. Section 482 CrPC; Precedents like Bhajan Lal and Pepsi Foods.
Analysis The Court found the complaint based on conjecture and not supported by authenticated documents. It saw the FIR as malicious and an abuse of legal process.
Conclusion The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings, holding that they were unwarranted and vindictive in nature.
Current Scenario The accused sportspersons are cleared of charges; FIR quashed; they continue to maintain their unblemished national reputation.

 

SOURCE – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

ALSO READSections 420, 468, 471, and 34 IPC

 

 

 

 

Written By Nancy Sharma

I am Nancy Mahavir Sharma, a passionate legal writer and a judicial service aspirant who is interested in legal researching and writing. I have completed Latin Legum Magister degree. I have been writing from past few years and I am excited to share my legal thoughts and opinions here. I believe that everyone has the potential to make a difference.

Related Posts