SC REFERS KEY QUESTION ON MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION TO LARGER BENCH

by | Aug 4, 2025

Supreme Court on interpretation of Section 163A.

Supreme Court reviews legality of accident compensation for heirs of owner-drivers.


 SC REFERS KEY QUESTION ON MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION TO LARGER BENCH


CASE SUMMARY – In Wakia Afrin vs. National Insurance Co., a minor sought compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act for her parents’ death in a car accident. Though MACT granted compensation, the High Court dismissed the claim, stating a dead person can’t be a respondent. The Supreme Court disagreed, holding Section 163A’s non-obstante clause overrides restrictive interpretations and covers no-fault liability. It observed conflicting precedents on whether heirs of the deceased owner-driver can claim compensation. Recognizing the legal ambiguity, the Court referred the issue to a larger bench for authoritative clarification.


ASPECTS DETAILS
Case Title Wakia Afrin (Minor) vs. M/s National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Introduction A minor, Wakia Afrin, filed for compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act for the death of both her parents in a car accident.
Factual Background Her parents died in a car crash due to tyre burst. Her father, also the vehicle’s owner, was shown as respondent despite being deceased. MACT awarded compensation; High Court dismissed claim citing deceased owner can’t be a respondent.
Legal Issues Whether a legal heir of the deceased owner-driver can claim compensation under Section 163A.
Applicable Law Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Sections 147, 149, 155, 163A, 166)
Analysis Examined prior case laws: Dhanraj, Jhuma Saha, Ningamma, etc. Highlighted the non-obstante clause in Section 163A, suggesting it overrides policy exclusions. Emphasized that the section does not require proof of negligence.
Conclusion The bench disagrees with previous decisions restricting Section 163A to third-party claims and refers the issue to a larger bench for authoritative interpretation.
Current Scenario Matter referred to the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India for placement before a larger bench for final determination.

 “Section 163A is a special provision overriding the Act, any law, or insurance instrument.”

SOURCE – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

READ ALSOROAD ACCIDENTS IN  INDIA

 

 

 

Written By Nancy Sharma

I am Nancy Mahavir Sharma, a passionate legal writer and a judicial service aspirant who is interested in legal researching and writing. I have completed Latin Legum Magister degree. I have been writing from past few years and I am excited to share my legal thoughts and opinions here. I believe that everyone has the potential to make a difference.

Related Posts