Magistrate-led inquiries under Section 196 BNSS ensure transparency in custodial deaths, disappearances, and rape cases, promoting accountability and justice.
Introduction
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 is a major reform in criminal procedural laws of India , focusing on enhancing transparency and accountability within the justice system. One of its key provisions, Inquiry By Magistrate Into Cause Of Death (Section 196) which see that certain deaths and incidents undergo thorough scrutiny beyond standard police investigations. The provision gives the power to magistrates to conduct independent inquiries by strengthening the reliability of the process of investigation.
By establishing a structured mechanism for judicial oversight, Inquiry By Magistrate Into Cause Of Death (Section 196) has an important role in upholding justice. It see that cases involving suspicious, unnatural or custodial deaths are examined with impartiality, strengthening public trust in the legal system.
Section 196 of BNSS
Section 196 describes certain circumstances under which a magistrate is mandated or authorized to conduct an inquiry into the cause of death :
- Mandatory Inquiry : In cases specified under clauses (i) and (ii) of sub-section (3) of Section 194 like the suicide or suspicious death of a woman within 7 years of marriage to the nearest empowered magistrate is need to conduct an inquiry.
- Discretionary Inquiry: For other cases mentioned in sub-section (1) of Section 194 any empowered magistrate may choose to hold an inquiry either replacing or supplementing the police investigation.
The magistrate conducting such an inquiry possesses all the powers same to those exercised during an inquiry into an offense.
Additionally, Section 196 addresses situations where :
- A person dies or disappears while in police custody or any custody authorized by a magistrate or court.
- A woman alleges rape while in such custody.
In these scenarios, the magistrate within whose jurisdiction the offense happened must conduct an inquiry alongside the police investigation. The magistrate is responsible for recording evidence and may order the exhumation and examination of a body if deemed necessary and should inform the deceased’s known relatives about the inquiry, permitting their presence when practicable. Furthermore, within 24 hours of a death, the magistrate or investigating officer must forward the body for examination to a qualified medical professional unless impractical with reasons documented in writing. The term “relative” is defined to include parents, children, siblings and spouse.
Landmark Cases or Judgments
While Section 196 BNSS is a recent enactment, its principles stick with those of Section 176 of the previous Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The judiciary of India has stressed on the significance of magistrate inquiries in custodial deaths and suspicious circumstances .
- People’s Union for Civil Liberties vs. State of Maharashtra (2014) – Supreme Court of India showed the necessity of independent judicial inquiries in cases of encounter deaths for transparency and accountability. Such judgments show the commitment of the judiciary to upholding human rights for thorough investigations in cases of unnatural deaths.
Misuse and Safeguards
The provisions under Section 196 are made to stop potential misuse and ensure fair investigations :
- Mandatory Judicial Oversight : In cases of deaths in custody or involving women within 7 years of marriage, mandatory magistrate inquiries act as a check against potential police misconduct.
- Family Participation: Informing relatives and permitting their presence during inquiries encourages transparency and trust in the investigative process.
- Medical Examination: Fast forwarding of the body for medical examination so that evidence is preserved and the cause of death is accurately determined.
These protections collectively aim to uphold the integrity of investigations and safeguards individual rights.
Impact
The implementation of Section 196 is expected to:
- Increase Transparency: Judicial inquiries complement police investigations by reducing biases and ensuring impartiality.
- Strengthen Accountability: Mandatory inquiries in specific cases hold law enforcement agencies accountable mainly in custodial incidents.
- Build Public Confidence: Transparent and thorough investigations strengthen trust in the criminal justice system among citizens.
Comparison with New BNSS and Old Section under CrPC
Section 196 BNSS corresponds to Section 176 of the erstwhile CrPC. While the core principles remain consistent—mandating magistrate inquiries in specific death cases—the BNSS aims to smoothen procedures and address ambiguities present in the older legislation. The focus on timely medical examinations and family participation show a progressive approach to protecting human rights within the investigative structure .
Amendments and Other Important Information
The transition from the CrPC to the BNSS shows a complete effort to modernize India’s criminal justice system. While Section 196 has foundational elements from its predecessor, it introduces refinements to increase procedural clarity and effectiveness. Continuous evaluation of its implementation will be necessary to identify areas for further improvement so that the objectives of justice and transparency are met.
Conclusion
Section 196 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has an important role so that deaths under suspicious circumstances are investigated carefully and impartially. By mandating magistrate led inquiries in specific cases, incorporating safeguards against misuse and emphasizing transparency, the provision strengthens the integrity of India’s criminal justice system and upholds the principles of justice and human rights.
Source
