In a groundbreaking decision, a 5-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has recently ruled against the Electoral Bond Scheme, emphasizing its violation of the fundamental right to information enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. This ruling marks a pivotal moment in Indian electoral history, shedding light on the complexities and controversies surrounding political funding.
Background:
The Electoral Bond Scheme was introduced by the government to streamline political donations by providing anonymity to donors. Under this scheme, individuals and organizations could purchase bonds from specified banks and donate them to political parties without disclosing their identities. While proponents argued for increased transparency and accountability, critics raised concerns about potential misuse and lack of transparency.
Electoral Bond Scheme:
Electoral bonds are financial instruments introduced by the Indian government to enable individuals, companies, and entities to donate money to political parties in India. These bonds, akin to promissory notes, can be purchased from designated bank branches for specified denominations, allowing donors to contribute anonymously.
| Feature | Description |
| Nature | Financial instruments |
| Purpose | Facilitate donations to political parties |
| Anonymity | Donors can purchase and donate bonds without disclosing their identities |
| Legality | Recognized under the Electoral Bond Scheme introduced by the Indian government |
| Transparency | Political parties are required to deposit bonds into designated bank accounts, ensuring transparency in the flow of funds |
| Redemption | Bonds can only be redeemed by registered political parties within a specified period |
| Denominations | Available in various denominations |
| Issuers | Specified branches of authorized banks |
| Criticisms | Concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and the potential for misuse |
| Objectives | Reform political funding – Promote transparency and accountability – Address concerns about the influence of black money in elections |
| Validity | Until redeemed or expired |
| Eligibility | Donors: Individuals, companies, or entities permitted under relevant laws – Recipients: Registered political parties |
History:
The Electoral Bond Scheme was proposed in 2017 to cleanse political funding and combat black money’s influence in elections. Despite initial doubts, the scheme was implemented in 2018, enabling the issuance and sale of bonds in various denominations.
Timeline:
- 2017: Proposal of the Electoral Bond Scheme by means of the government.
- 2018: Implementation of the scheme with the issuance and sale of electoral bonds.
- 2022: Supreme Court hears a petition hard the constitutionality of the scheme.
- 2024: Supreme Court supplies a landmark verdict putting down the Electoral Bond Scheme.
| Act | Description | Relation to Electoral Bond |
| Representation of the People Act, 1951 | Governs the conduct of elections in India and regulates political funding and campaign expenses. | The Electoral Bond Scheme intersects with this act as it pertains to political funding and contributions during elections. |
| Companies Act, 2013 | Regulates the functioning and management of companies in India, including provisions related to corporate donations. | Electoral bonds involve corporate entities purchasing bonds to donate to political parties, thus implicating the Companies Act. |
| Income Tax Act, 1961 | Governs the taxation system in India, including provisions related to disclosure of income sources and tax exemptions. | The Income Tax Act may be relevant to electoral bonds in terms of taxation implications for donors and recipients. |
| Right to Information Act, 2005 | Provides a framework for citizens to access information from public authorities, including political parties. | The Electoral Bond Scheme’s anonymity provision has been challenged under the Right to Information Act, highlighting its relation to transparency issues. |
Impact:
The Supreme Court’s decision to strike down the Electoral Bond Scheme has far-reaching implications, reaffirming transparency and accountability principles in political financing. It prompts discussions on electoral reforms and the need for robust regulation of political finance mechanisms.
Significance:
The verdict underscores the judiciary’s role in upholding constitutional values and ensuring transparency in democratic processes. It highlights the importance of electoral reform and strengthening democratic institutions in India.
The Electoral Bond Scheme’s demise exemplifies the intricate interplay between politics, law, and governance. While initially well-intentioned, its flaws and constitutional violations have led to its downfall. As India strives for a more transparent and accountable political system, lessons from this episode will shape future electoral finance practices.
Source: THE INDIAN EXPRESS
READ MORE: Prevention of Unfair Means Bill 2024 – The LawGist
