Headline
The Supreme Court of India ruled against domicile based quotas in the admissions of NEET-PG 2024.
Summary
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that domicile-based reservations in PG medical admissions is unconstitutional, stating a violation of Article 14 of Indian Constitution. The 3 judge bench stated that state quota seats must be allotted based on the merits of the NEET.
Key Facts
- Case Name: TANVI BEHL vs. SHREY GOEL & ORS
- Judges Name: Justice Hrishikesh Roy, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, Justice SVN Bhatti.
- The decision of the Supreme Court is that domicile-based reservations in PG medical courses violate Article 14 of Indian Constitution.
- Precedents: Reaffirmed rulings in the cases of Pradeep Jain and Saurabh Chandra.
- Clarification: Existing admissions under domicile quotas remain unaffected.
Legal Insights
The Supreme Court of India stresses that India has only 1 domicile, making sure the right to study, work, and reside anywhere in the country. Unlike MBBS, PG admissions need a merit-based approach due to the unique nature of the profession.
Impact
This decision of the Supreme Court upholds meritocracy in NEET-PG 2024 admissions, by making sure of the fair competition for all candidates across India.
Why It Matters
By striking down state-based discrimination, the ruling of the Supreme Court provides equal opportunity in higher medical education and the fundamental right to equality under Article 14 of Indian Constitution.
Source:
