DOCTRINE OF SEVERABILITY 

by | Oct 22, 2024

It deals with a situation where a part of the law or statue is unconstitutional or is violative of the Fundamental Rights then that part of the law or statute is declared to be void by the courts while the other part is declared to be valid. In layman’s language, the doctrine of severability removes the void part of the statue from the valid part. Once the void part is removed, the remaining statute is enforced. It applies to both pre-constitutional laws and post-constitutional laws. 

There are two main factors that courts apply while applying this doctrine:

  • Legislative Intent
  • Public Interes

Application of the Doctrine in Case Law

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of AK Gopalan vs. State of Madras, removed section 14 of Preventive detention and held the other provisions of the act to be valid.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of D.S. Nakara vs. Union of India, applied the doctrine of severability and held the remaining provisions to be valid. 

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of R.M.D.C vs. Union of India, laid down rules for applying severability. The rules are: 

  1. The key factor is legislature’s intent. The test is whether the legislature would have enacted the valid part if it had known beforehand that the rest of the part was invalid.
  2. If the invalid part cannot be separated from the valid part, then the whole statute needs to be declared as void. 
  3. If after removing the invalid part it seems to the court that the act has been altered excessively then the court may struck down the whole act. 
  4. In determining the legislative intent on the question of separability, it will be legitimate to take into account the history of legislation, its object, the title and preamble to it.

This doctrine is derived from Article 13 of the Constitution and provides that where only a part of the law is found to be inconsistent or is found that the law contravenes fundamental rights then that part of the law shall be declared as void under article 13 and not the entire statute. The courts apply this doctrine to separate the valid portion of the law from the invalid portion.

 

Also Read- 

 

Written By Palak Bhuwalka

Edited By Vishakha Khatri

 

 

 

Written By Team Law Gist

Related Posts

PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE

PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE

The Principles of Natural Justice are a part of common law the main objective of these principles being imposed on judicial system is that to ensure that the...

THE WOMEN’S RESERVATION BILL, 2023

THE WOMEN’S RESERVATION BILL, 2023

The Women’s Reservation Bill, officially known as the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (128th Constitutional Amendment Bill),shows a major step in democratic...

DOCTRINE OF PITH AND SUBSTANCE 

DOCTRINE OF PITH AND SUBSTANCE 

This doctrine first emerged in the Canadian Constitution. It related to an interpretation of statutes to solve the problem of competing legislation in the...

DOCTRINE OF ECLIPSE

DOCTRINE OF ECLIPSE

Eclipse happens when one thing overshadows the other. As the name implies, the Doctrine of Eclipse is used when any legislation or conduct breaches...

DOCTRINE OF BASIC STRUCTURE

DOCTRINE OF BASIC STRUCTURE

It is one of the fundamental judicial principles connected with the Indian Constitution. The doctrine of basic structure was first propounded in Kesavananda...