Current Affairs

DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (22 AUGUST 2025)

by | Aug 22, 2025

Supreme Court on Congress PIL, stray dog menace, and PIL misuse—balancing democracy, safety, and judicial discipline.

The Supreme Court dealt with three key issues: Congress de-registration over “vote chori,” stray dog safety, and warning against PIL misuse for personal vendetta.

DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (22 AUGUST 2025)

PIL SEEKS DE-REGISTRATION OF CONGRESS OVER “VOTE CHORI” REMARKS

Case Name: SATISH KUMAR AGGARWAL vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

A PIL before the Supreme Court demands cancellation of the Congress party’s registration for its “Vote Chori” campaign against the Election Commission. The petitioner alleged that Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge deliberately spread false narratives to undermine the ECI’s credibility, urging judicial intervention to protect electoral integrity and democratic processes.

Legal Framework:

The legal provisions are mentioned below – 

  • Article 324 – Powers of Election Commission.
  • Representation of the People Act, 1951 – Conditions for registration/deregistration of political parties.
  • Article 19(1)(a) – Freedom of speech; subject to reasonable restrictions.
  • Supreme Court Precedents – Misuse of PIL in political contexts.

Source: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT REVIEWS STRAY DOG MENACE CASE

Case Name: SUO MOTO through news “City hounded by strays and kids pay price”

The Supreme Court will pronounce a verdict on this issue today 22nd of august regarding rising stray dog attacks, highlighting the challenge of balancing public safety with animal rights. While victims’ groups pressed for strict control, animal welfare bodies stressed sterilization and vaccination as humane solutions. The Court directed States to frame effective policies ensuring both citizen safety and animal protection. 

Legal Framework:

The legal provisions are mentioned below – 

  • Article 21 – Protects right to life and safety of citizens.
  • Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 – Prohibits cruelty against animals.
  • Article 48A – State’s duty to protect wildlife.
  • Earlier SC Guidelines – Mandated sterilization/vaccination instead of culling.

Source: Supreme Court of India

PIL NOT A TOOL FOR PERSONAL RIVALRIES: SC

Case Name: PRAKASH SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) vs. UNION OF INDIA Respondent(s)

The Supreme Court rejected a PIL filed by one officer against another, cautioning that public interest litigation cannot be converted into a battlefield for service rivalries. The Court underscored that PILs exist to advance public welfare, not private agendas, and misuse of this remedy undermines judicial resources and public trust.

Legal Framework

The legal provisions are mentioned below – 

  • Article 32 – Right to constitutional remedies.
  • Doctrine of PIL – Judicial innovation for community rights.
  • State of Uttaranchal v. Balwant Singh Chaufal (2010) – Principles against PIL misuse.
  • Imposition of Costs – Court may penalize frivolous litigants.

Source: Supreme Court of India

Also Read: DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (20 AUGUST 2025)

 

 

 

 

Written By Vishakha Khatri

My name is Vishakha Khatri. I am an engineering graduate and a civil service aspirant with a passion for spreading knowledge about Indian polity. I believe that understanding our political system is crucial for every citizen, and I am committed to making this information accessible to everyone in my own easy way. Through my experiences in civil service preparation and my unique perspective as an engineering graduate, I hope to inspire and educate others on the importance of Indian polity.

Related Posts