From VP nomination of ex-SC judge to SC questioning Governors’ bill delays and reprimanding an IPS officer—key constitutional developments shaping India’s governance.
DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (19 AUGUST 2025)
INDIA BLOC NAMES JUSTICE (RETD.) B. SUDERSHAN REDDY AS VICE-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE
Overview: Constitutional Nomination for Vice-Presidency
The opposition INDIA bloc has nominated former Supreme Court judge Justice B. Sudershan Reddy for the Vice-Presidential elections scheduled on September 9, 2025. Known for his progressive judgments, his candidature highlights the increasing trend of retired judges entering constitutional politics, raising debates on neutrality and post-retirement roles of the judiciary.
Legal Framework:
The legal provisions are mentioned below –
- Article 66, Constitution of India – Election of Vice-President by an electoral college of MPs.
- Article 124(7),Constitution of India – Restriction on post-retirement practice by judges; no bar on holding constitutional office.
- Debate: Balance between judicial independence and post-retirement public appointments.
Source: PTI
SUPREME COURT QUESTIONS GOVERNOR’S DELAY IN BILL ASSENT
Case Name: In Re: Assent, Withholding or Reservation of Bills (Presidential Reference, 2025)
During a Presidential Reference hearing, the Supreme Court asked the Attorney General what remedies exist if Governors indefinitely withhold state bills. The bench explored whether prolonged inaction violates the constitutional scheme, hinting at the possibility of invoking Article 142 to declare “deemed assent” and preserve legislative supremacy.
Legal Framework:
The legal provisions are mentioned below –
- Article 200, Constitution of India – Governor must either assent, withhold, or reserve bills; unreasonable delay violates legislative intent.
- Article 201, Constitution of India – Bills reserved for President’s consideration.
- Article 142, Constitution of India – Supreme Court’s extraordinary power to ensure “complete justice,” possibly including deemed assent.
- Article 143, Constitution of India – Presidential Reference jurisdiction for advisory opinion.
Source: Supreme Court of India
IPS OFFICER REPRIMANDED FOR SUPPORTING MURDER CONVICT
Case Title: Madhuri Devi vs. Arjun Das @ Kariya & Ors.
The Supreme Court strongly criticized Bihar IPS officer Ashok Mishra for filing an affidavit backing a convicted murderer, contrary to the prosecution’s case. The Court held his action as a serious breach of constitutional duty, reminding public servants that their allegiance is to the Constitution rather than political or personal bosses.
Legal Framework:
The legal provisions are mentioned below –
- Sections 302 & 34 IPC – Murder with common intention.
- Section 120B IPC – Criminal conspiracy.
- Section 27(3), Arms Act, 1959 – Use of prohibited arms.
- Article 311, Constitution – Conduct and disciplinary control over civil servants.
- Principle: Public officials owe primary loyalty to the Constitution and Rule of Law.
Source: Supreme Court of India
READ ALSO – DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS (18 AUGUST 2025)
