Courtroom Chronicles
Courtrooms Chronicle provides comprehensive coverage of judgments, case updates, court orders, and public interest litigations (PIL). Stay informed on the latest legal developments, landmark decisions, and significant rulings across various jurisdictions. Whether you’re a legal professional, researcher, or interested citizen, Courtrooms Chronicle delivers timely and insightful content to keep you abreast of the dynamic landscape of the judiciary system.
Recent Posts
SC Shields Faculty Promotions from HC Interference
The Supreme Court in Dr. Jiji K.S. v. Shibu K (2026) reaffirmed the finality of its judgments, holding that High Court orders cannot undermine promotions already granted pursuant to a prior Supreme Court decision relating to AICTE qualification requirements.
SUPREME COURT ON OPEN PRISONS AND PRISON REFORMS
The Supreme Court in Suhas Chakma v Union of India recognized Open Correctional Institutions as a constitutional solution to prison overcrowding and mandated structural reforms for dignified incarceration.
SUPREME COURT HOLDS ROOH AFZA AS FRUIT DRINK UNDER UPVAT – 4% VAT APPLICABLE
The Supreme Court ruled that Rooh Afza qualifies as a fruit drink under UPVAT and is taxable at 4%, rejecting classification under the residuary entry.
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES IBC vs BENAMI ACT JURISDICTION IN S RAJENDRAN CASE
The Supreme Court ruled that insolvency tribunals cannot interfere with attachment and confiscation proceedings under the Benami Act, reinforcing the limits of IBC jurisdiction.
SUPREME COURT ON ILLEGAL STING OPERATION UNDER PCPNDT ACT
The Supreme Court examined whether a sting operation authorized by a single member of the District Appropriate Authority under the PCPNDT Act vitiates subsequent prosecution. The case clarifies collective decision-making under Section 30 and reinforces procedural safeguards in social welfare legislation.
SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS MURDER CONVICTION BASED ON CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN NEELU KOSHTI CASE
The Supreme Court reaffirmed that a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, including recovery under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, is sufficient to sustain a murder conviction.