Wife of Sonam Wangchuk moves Supreme Court challenging his preventive detention under NSA in Ladakh protests case.
Case in NewsWife challenges Sonam Wangchuk detention under National Security Act before Supreme Court of India . |
Discover powerful Latin Maxims and simplify complex legal terms in seconds.
Case Overview
Case Name: Gitanjali J Angmo vs. Union of India & Ors.
Gitanjali J Angmo, wife of activist and innovator Sonam Wangchuk has moved the Supreme Court of India against his detention under the National Security Act (NSA) . The plea, filed on October 2, 2025 through advocate Sarvam Ritam Khare, challenges the order passed by authorities after Wangchuk’s arrest on September 26b. He was detained from Ladakh and transferred to a jail in Jodhpurb. The matter arises amid protests and violence in Ladakh demanding statehood for the Union Territory . The bench for hearing is yet to be listed as the Court is closed for Dussehra vacation .
Step into the world of justice with Courtroom Chronicles
Key Aspects
The case highlights both the factual matrix surrounding Wangchuk’s arrest and the legal issues that followb. It brings into question the balance between security concerns and individual liberty especially in the backdrop of demands for Ladakh’s statehood .
- Sonam Wangchuk was arrested on September 26, 2025, from Ladakh .
- Detained under Preventive Detention law – National Security Act, 1980 .
- Authorities cited law and order concerns after violent protests in Ladakh .
- Petition alleges arbitrary detention violating constitutional rights and due process .
Legal Insights
Preventive detention is always subject to constitutional checks . The petition invokes multiple provisions to examine whether the detention meets legal standards .
- Article 21 – Right to life and personal liberty cannot be curtailed without procedure established by law under Indian Constitution .
- Article 22(4)–(7) – Preventive detention limited; maximum 12 months; Advisory Board review mandatory .
- National Security Act, 1980 – Section 3 empowers government to detain individuals prejudicial to security of India or public order .
- Judicial precedents like A.K. Gopalan vs. State of Madras and Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India establish that preventive detention must satisfy reasonableness and fairness under Articles 14 and 21b.
Court’s Verdict
The Supreme Court of India has not yet heard the matter since the Court is closed for Dussehra vacation . The eventual verdict will decide whether Sonam Wangchuk’s detention under the National Security Act is justified amidst the volatile situation in Ladakh .
Source – Supreme Court of India
Read also – Indian Constitution
The LawGist ensures exam success with quality notes—TPL, Current Affairs, Recent Judgments, and more. Backed by trusted resources and videos, The LawGist is every aspirant’s first choice. Discover more at thelawgist.org.
