Introduction
The Delhi Police have filed a 1000-page chargesheet under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) against six individuals involved in a security breach at the Parliament. The chargesheet was submitted to Delhi’s Patiala House Court.
Background
On December 13, last year, two individuals jumped into the Lok Sabha chamber from the public gallery and released canisters emitting yellow smoke, causing panic among the MPs. The breach occurred on the anniversary of the 2001 Parliament attack. The case was initially registered at the Parliament Street police station and later transferred to the Counter Intelligence Unit of the Special Cell, New Delhi.
Key Points
- Chargesheet Filed: 1000-page chargesheet under UAPA.
- Court: Patiala House Court, Delhi.
- Accused: Manoranjan D, Sagar Sharma, Amol Dhanraj Shinde, Neelam Azad, Lalit Jha, and Mahesh Kumawat.
- Event Date: December 13 (anniversary of the 2001 Parliament attack).
- Incident: Two individuals jumped into the Lok Sabha chamber and released yellow smoke.
- Judicial Custody: Extended till July 15.
- Supplementary Chargesheet: To be filed in two weeks pending prosecution sanctions.
Legal Provisions
Law | Section | Description |
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act | Section 16 | Punishment for terrorist acts |
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act | Section 18 | Punishment for conspiracy |
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act | Section 20 | Punishment for being a member of a terrorist gang or organization |
Indian Penal Code (IPC) | Section 120B | Punishment for criminal conspiracy |
Indian Penal Code (IPC) | Section 121 | Waging, or attempting to wage war, or abetting waging of war, against the Government of India |
Indian Penal Code (IPC) | Section 124A | Sedition |
Indian Penal Code (IPC) | Section 436 | Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to destroy house, etc. |
Impact
The security breach on a significant date raised concerns about the effectiveness of security measures in place at the Parliament. The incident highlighted the need for stricter surveillance and more robust security protocols to prevent such occurrences.
Conclusion
The filing of the chargesheet marks a significant step in addressing the security lapse at the Parliament. The judicial process will now proceed with the consideration of the supplementary chargesheet and further legal actions against the accused. The case underscores the importance of maintaining stringent security measures at critical national institutions.
SOURCE – INDIA TODAY
READ MORE – RAHUL GANDHI GRANTED BAIL IN KARNATAKA BJP DEFAMATION CASE