For decades, the Cauvery Water Dispute has been a bitter battleground between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, with Kerala and Puducherry also caught in the crossfire. However, a recent Supreme Court Verdict has breathed new life into hopes for resolution.
Background:
The roots of this conflict stretch back to the colonial era when the Madras Presidency and the Mysore Kingdom clashed over the Cauvery’s waters in 1880. Despite various attempts to find common ground, including tribunals and agreements, the dispute remained unresolved, involving more states over time.
Historical Context:
In 1924, an initial agreement was brokered between Madras Presidency and Mysore Kingdom. Yet, subsequent disagreements drew Kerala and Puducherry into the fray. A tribunal was convened in 1976, but its decisions failed to bring lasting peace.
Supreme Court’s Verdict and Previous Cases:
In its recent ruling, the Supreme Court directed Karnataka to release 177.25 TMC (Thousand Million Cubic) feet of water to Tamil Nadu from the Biligundlu dam. However, Tamil Nadu’s allocation was reduced by 14.75 TMC feet, while Karnataka’s share increased by the same amount, valid for the next 15 years.
Current Scenario:
The Supreme Court also permitted the extraction of an additional 10 TMC feet of groundwater from the Cauvery basin, emphasising the priority of drinking water supply over other uses.
Significance:
The verdict brings much-needed clarity and stability to the regions reliant on the Cauvery’s waters. It aims to ease tensions and ensure fair distribution, vital for agriculture and urban needs in the respective states.
Aftermath:
While Karnataka expressed satisfaction, Tamil Nadu faces challenges due to reduced water allocation. Security measures have been heightened in both states to prevent potential unrest.
The Cauvery water dispute has been a prolonged struggle, affecting the lives of millions in Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. The Supreme Court’s ruling is a significant step towards resolution, offering a framework for equitable water sharing and fostering regional harmony. However, continued efforts are essential to ensure effective implementation and long-term peace in the Cauvery basin.
Legal and Constitutional Framework:
Framework Component |
Description |
Constitutional Provisions |
|
Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 |
|
Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT) |
|
Supreme Court Judgments |
|
State Water Policies and Acts |
|
International Agreements |
|
Source- Bhaskar.com
Read Also- LADAKH PROTEST