Introduction
In the case of Siddharth Komal Singla & Ors v. National Testing Agency & Ors (Diary No. 28450/2024), 65 medical students from Gujarat have petitioned the Supreme Court of India to oppose the re-conducting of the NEET-UG 2024 examination. They argue for maintaining the current results while excluding those who engaged in unfair practices.
Background
The NEET-UG 2024 examination, conducted by the National Testing Agency (NTA) on May 5, 2024, has faced allegations of malpractices, including paper leaks. These allegations have led to calls for the exam to be conducted afresh, creating significant stress among students who cleared the exam through legitimate means. Following the declaration of results on June 4, 2024, the issue has escalated, with multiple petitions filed regarding the integrity of the examination.
Key Points
1.Petitioners’ Stand:
- The petitioners argue that re-conducting the exam would be unfair to those who passed it honestly, violating their fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21A of the Constitution.
- They request the Supreme Court to direct the NTA to continue with the current results, excluding only those who cheated.
- The petitioners emphasize the mental stress caused by ongoing media coverage about a potential re-exam.
2.Reliefs Sought:
- A writ of mandamus to prevent the cancellation of the NEET-UG 2024 examination and its results.
- An investigation to identify and penalize those involved in fraudulent activities.
- Any other appropriate orders deemed fit by the Court.
3.Other Related Petitions:
- Several petitions allege malpractices in the NEET-UG 2024 examination, calling for a re-exam and a CBI investigation.
- Petitions also challenge the arbitrary grant of grace marks to 1,536 candidates.
- The Supreme Court will hear these combined petitions on July 8, 2024.
Legal Provisions:
- Article 14: Ensures equality before the law and equal protection of the laws.
- Article 21A: Guarantees the right to education for children aged 6 to 14 years.
- Writ of Mandamus:A judicial remedy directing a public authority to perform a duty required by law.
Impact:
The Supreme Court’s decision will significantly affect the medical admissions process for 2024. A re-exam could disrupt the plans of thousands of students who prepared diligently and passed the exam. Conversely, maintaining the current results with actions against fraudulent candidates could restore confidence in the examination system but requires an effective mechanism to identify and penalize the wrongdoers.
Conclusion:
The Supreme Court’s ruling will be crucial in balancing the interests of honest students and upholding the integrity of the examination process. The case highlights the need for secure and fair conduct of national exams and robust measures to address malpractices. As the hearing date approaches, the focus remains on ensuring justice for all parties involved.
SOURCE –
